Immunostimulatory compositions and methods of use thereof

ABSTRACT

Lipid conjugates for enhanced delivery of cargo to the lymph nodes are disclosed. The lipid conjugates typically include three domains: a lipophilic domain that binds to albumin, a polar block domain, and a cargo such as a molecular adjuvant or immunostimulatory compound (such as an oligonucleotide) or antigenic peptide. Depending on the cargo, the length and compositions of the polar block can be tailored to push the equilibrium toward albumin binding, stable micelle formation, or cell insertion. The conjugates can be administered to a subject, for example, a subject with cancer or an infection, to induce or enhance a robust immune response in the subject.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of pending prior U.S. applicationSer. No. 14/790,432, filed Jul. 2, 2015, which is a divisional of U.S.application Ser. No. 13/844,075, filed Mar. 15, 2013 (now U.S. Pat. No.9,107,904, issued Aug. 18, 2015), which claims priority to and benefitof U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/620,518 filed Apr. 5, 2012, whichare herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the field of vaccine technology, and morespecifically to albumin-binding lipids conjugated to cargo and whichefficiently target the cargo to the lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Subunit vaccines present an antigen to the immune system withoutintroducing viral particles in an effort to generate an immune responsethat is effective against that antigen. Such subunit vaccines are oftenpoorly immunogenic and require co-administration of one or moreadjuvants to generate an effective immune response (Perrie, Y., et al.,Int. J. Pharm. 364, 272-280 (2008); Zepp, F. Vaccine 28S C14-C24(2010)). Immunostimulatory oligonucleotides, such as those containingunmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine (“CG” or “CpG”) motifs, can beused as an adjuvant to stimulate both cellular and humoral immuneresponses (Vollmer, J. & Krieg, A. M. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 61,195-204 (2009); Klinman, D. M. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4, 249-259 (2004)). Achallenge to the clinical application of oligonucleotides as a vaccineadjuvant is the lack of an efficient system with which to target theoligonucleotides in vivo to the immune cells of the lymphatic system(Von Beust, B. R., et al. Eur. J. Immunol. 35, 1869-1876 (2005);Bourquin, C., et al., J. Immunol. 181, 2990-2998 (2008)).

Transporting antigens/adjuvants from the location of injection tosecondary lymph nodes is challenging and depends upon the complexphysiology of the lymphatic system (Pal, I. & Ramsey, J. D. Adv. DrugDelivery Rev. 63, 909-922 (2011); Reddy, S. T., et al., Nat. Biotechnol.25, 1159-1164 (2007)). Antigens/adjuvants introduced into the body maybe taken up by immune dendritic cells (DCs) at the injection site andthen carried to lymph node through DC trafficking (e.g., cell associatedantigen or larger particles, >200 nm). Alternatively, they coulddirectly enter the lymphatic vessels and drain into the secondarylymphoid organs (e.g., small particles, <200 nm) where a significantportion of the immune cells reside (Bachmann, M. F. & Jennings, G. T.Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 787-796 (2010); Reddy, S. T., et al., Nat.Biotechnol. 25, 1159-1164 (2007); Singh, M. Vaccine adjuvant anddelivery system. Wiley. (2007); Oyewumi, M. O., et al., Expert Rev.Vaccines 9, 1095-1107 (2010); Cal, S., et al., Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.63, 901-908 (2011); Manolova, V., et al. Eru. J. Immunol. 38, 1404-1413(2008)).

Soluble antigen/adjuvant compounds flush through lymph nodes withinhours (Pape, et al., Immunity 26, 491-502 (2007)), providing only abrief exposure to the vaccine. Attempts to enhance the delivery ofantigens/adjuvants to lymph nodes following parenteral injection haveincluded the use of depot-forming adjuvants or particulate carriers thatare preferentially internalized by antigen presenting cells (Johansena,et al., Journal of Controlled Release, 148, 56-62 (2010), Moon, et al.,Adv. Mater., 24, 3724-3746 (2012), Bachmann and Jennings, Nat. Rev.Immunol. 10, 787-796 (2010), Hubbel, et al., Nature, 462, 449-460(2009), Pal, & Ramsey, J. D. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 63, 909-922(2011), Reddy, et al., J. A. Nat. Biotechnol., 25, 1159-1164 (2007),John, et al., Nature Materials, 11, 250-257 (2012)) but these approachesdo not achieve the potency of direct injection of vaccines into lymphoidtissues (Senti, et al., Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 9:537-543(2009)). Molecularly-targeted vaccines based on the conjugation ofantigen to antibodies or other ligands targeting dendritic cells notonly reach DCs in the draining lymph nodes, but also drain into thesystemic circulation and access DCs in distal tissues (Keler, et al.,Oncogene, 26, 3758-67 (2007), Tacken, et al., Nat. Rev. Immunol., 10,790-802 (2007), Tenbusch, et al., PLoS ONE, 7, e39038 (2012)). Suchsystemic delivery may promote tolerance unless inflammatory adjuvantsare also systemically co-administered, an approach likely to give riseto unacceptable toxicity in prophylactic vaccines.

However, there remains a need for efficient delivery systems to targetantigens/adjuvants to lymphoid-residing antigen presenting cells,especially CD8+ DCs, a step that is important for inducing a cytotoxic Tlymphocyte (CTL) response as CD8+ DCs are the major DCs capable ofcross-presentation (Smith, C. M., et al., J. Immunol. 170, 4437-4440(2003); Schnorrer, P., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103,10729-10734 (2006); Bedoui, S., et al., Nat. Immunol. 10, 488-495(2009)), a process required for presenting extracellular antigens withinMHC class I molecules to CD8+ T cells.

Therefore, it is an object of the invention to provide compositions andmethods of increasing delivery of vaccine adjuvants to the lymph nodes.

It is also an object to the invention to provide compositions and methodfor increasing delivery of vaccine antigens to the lymph nodes.

It is another object of the invention to provide immunogeniccompositions and methods of use thereof for increasing delivery acombination of vaccine adjuvants and antigens to the lymph nodes.

It is a further object of the invention to provide immunogeniccompositions and methods of use thereof for inducing an immune response.

It is another object of the invention to provide compositions andmethods for increasing retention of vaccine adjuvants and antigenslocally, at the site of administration and ipsilateral draining lymphnodes.

It is a further object of the invention to provide methods forincreasing local immune responses.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It has been discovered that albumin-binding lipids can be conjugated tocargo and efficiently target the cargo to the lymph nodes in vivo. It isbelieved that upon in vivo introduction, the lipid conjugates bind toendogenous albumin, which prevents the conjugates from rapidly flushinginto the bloodstream and instead re-targets them to lymphatics anddraining lymph nodes where they accumulate due to filtering of albuminby antigen presenting cells. When the lipid conjugate includes animmunostimulant such as an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide orantigenic peptide, the conjugates can induce or enhance a robust immuneresponse.

The amphiphilic albumin-binding conjugates include

(a) a lipid component;

(b) an optional polar component; and

(c) an immunomodulatory compound or molecular adjuvant;

wherein the immunomodulatory compound or molecular adjuvant is bounddirectly to the lipid or is bound to the lipid via a linker, wherein theconjugate is sufficiently soluble such that the lipid binds to albuminunder physiological conditions, and wherein a plurality of theconjugates can spontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution.

Lipid conjugates including lipid-oligonucleotide conjugates andlipid-peptide conjugates and their use for stimulating immune responseare disclosed. For example, amphiphilic oligonucleotide conjugates fortargeting the lymph nodes can include an immunostimulatoryoligonucleotide which (i) is conjugated directly to a lipid, or (ii) islinked to a linker which is conjugated to a lipid. Typically, the lipidbinds to albumin under physiological conditions. In some embodiments, aplurality of the oligonucleotide conjugates can spontaneously formmicelles in aqueous solution which can be disrupted by the addition ofan albumin containing agent. In a specific embodiment, 64% or more ofthe micelles are disrupted in the presence of 20% fetal bovine serum.

In some embodiments for targeting the lymph nodes, the oligonucleotideincludes an oligonucleotide linker including 0, 1, or 2 consecutiveguanines. For example, the conjugate can have the structureL-5′-G_(n)-ON-3′, wherein “L” the lipid, “G” is a guanine, “n” is 0-2,and “ON” is the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide.

The lipid of the conjugate typically binds to albumin. An exemplarylipid is a diacyl lipid, such a diacyl lipid wherein the chains includeC12 or more hydrocarbon units.

The immunostimulatory oligonucleotide can be a ligand for a patternrecognition receptor such as CpG, and have a modified backbone such as aphosphorothioate (PS) backbone. In some embodiments, the oligonucleotideincludes 20 or more nucleic acids.

Conjugates for retention at sites at or near the site of administrationare also disclosed. Referred to as micelle-stabilizing conjugates, thecargo and the lipid are typically linked by an oligonucleotide linkerincluding at least three consecutive guanines. Typically the conjugatesspontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution that are resistant todisruption by albumin. In a particular embodiment, more than 36% of themicelles are intact in the presence of 20% fetal bovine serum. In someembodiments, the oligonucleotide conjugate has the structureL-5′-G_(n)-ON-3′, wherein “L” the lipid, “G” is a guanine, “n” is 3-10,and “ON” is the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide.

Lipid-peptide conjugates are also disclosed. Typically the conjugateincludes a peptide antigen which (i) is conjugated directly to a lipid,or (ii) is linked to a linker which is conjugated to a lipid. The lipidtypically binds to albumin under physiological conditions. In someembodiments, the peptide antigen, the linker, or the peptide antigen andlinker in combination are sufficiently polar to reduced or inhibitinsertion of the lipid into a cell's plasma membrane.

Immunogenic compositions including lipid-oligonucleotide conjugates,lipid-peptide conjugates, and combinations thereof are also disclosed.The immunogenic compositions can be used to increase an immune responsein a subject. Typically, the subject is administered an effective amountof the immunogenic composition to increase an effector immune cellresponse, for example, increase the number of CD8+ T cell expressingTNF-α or INF-γ compared to a control. The methods can be used to treatsubjects with cancer or infectious diseases.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1A is a schematic illustrating three domains of a lipid conjugate:cargo conjugated to a polar block which promotes solublizationconjugated to a lipophilic tail.

FIG. 1B is a schematic illustrating an exemplary lipid-oligonucleotideconjugate including an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide (CpG) cargoconjugated to a lipophilic tail.

FIG. 1C is a schematic illustrating an exemplary lipid-peptide conjugateincluding an antigenic peptide cargo conjugated to polar block which isconjugated to a lipophilic tail.

FIG. 1D is an exemplary lipid-oligonucleotide conjugate including adiacyl lipid tail conjugated to an oligo-guanine linker which isconjugated to an oligonucleotide cargo.

FIG. 1E is an exemplary lipid-peptide conjugate including a diacyl lipidtail conjugated to polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker which is conjugatedto a peptide cargo.

FIG. 1F is a series of plots showing fluorescence resonance energytransfer (FRET) of fluorescein labeled free CpG alone (left),fluorescein labeled free CpG mixed with rhodamine labeled bovine serumalbumin (BSA) (center), and rhodamine labeled alone (right).

FIG. 1G is a series of plots showing fluorescence resonance energytransfer (FRET) of fluorescein labeled Lipo-CpG alone (left),fluorescein labeled Lipo-CpG mixed with rhodamine labeled bovine serumalbumin (BSA) (center), and rhodamine labeled alone (right).

FIG. 2A is a schematic showing the design of exemplary lymph nodetargeting amphiphiles: the hydrophobic lipid-like tail (L) is conjugatedto the 5′-end of the CpG ODN, CpG sequence has fully phosphorothioatedbackbone. Three alternative lipids: cholesterol, acyl (C18), and diacyl(C18) are depicted.

FIG. 2B is a line graph showing the results of size exclusion HPLCfluorescein-labeled lipid-conjugated CpGs after incubation with fetalbovine serum (FBS) for 2 hours at 37° C.

FIG. 2C is two bar graphs showing in vivo LN (inguinal nodes in the leftgraph, and auxiliary nodes in the right graph) accumulation of CpGs indifferent fluorescein-labeled formulations (CpG-F, C18-CpG-F, Cho-CpG-F,Lipo-CpG-F, CpG-F in IFA, CpG-F in liposome) 24 hours after subcutaneousinjection of 3.3 nmol fluorescein labeled CpGs.

FIG. 2D is line graph showing the kinetics of CpG fluorescence(normalized to the injection dose) in LNs after injection with CpG-F(inguinal nodes (-●-) and auxiliary nodes (-▪-)) or Lipo-CpG-F (inguinalnodes (-▴-) and auxiliary nodes (-▾-)).

FIG. 2E is a schematic showing a generalized design of a lymph nodetargeting amphiphile containing an albumin binding domain, a polarspacer and a cargo linked at the end of the spacer.

FIG. 2F is an illustration showing that the length of the polar blockcontrols the balance of three-way equilibrium: intact micelles, albuminbound amhiphiles and cell membrane inserted amphiphiles.

FIGS. 2G and 2H show the effect of varying the length of a poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) linker of lipo-(PEG)_(n)-FITC conjugates on cell membraneinsertion and lymph node targeting, where n is the number of 4-unitoliogethylene glycol repeats in the PEG block. FIG. 2G is a bar graphshowing the quantification of cell insertion of amphiphiles withdifferent PEG length. FIG. 2H is two bar graphs showing in vivo LN(inguinal nodes in the left graph, and auxiliary nodes in the rightgraph) accumulation of amphiphiles in different fluorescein-labeledformulations (Lipo-(PEG)_(n)-F (n=1, 2, 4, 6, 8)) 24 hours aftersubcutaneous injection.

FIG. 2I is a line graph showing LNs uptake of amphiphilic fluoresceinlabeled PEG₂₀₀₀ as a function of lipid molecular weight (i.e., length).

FIG. 2J is a line graph showing LNs uptake of lipid-oligonucleotideconjugates as a function of oligonucleotide length.

FIG. 3A is a schematic showing the generalized construction andcharacterizations of G-quadruplex stabilized CpG adjuvants. G-quadruplexstabilized CpG micelles are self-assembled from an ODN composed of threesegments: an immunostimulatory CpG-ODN, a central repeat block containedn=1-10 G-quartet-forming guanines followed by 10-n non-interactingthymidines and a diacyllipid tail. In buffer, the ODN self-assemble intothree-dimensional spherical micelles with a CpG corona and a lipid core.In the presence of K⁺, guanine repeats form G-quadruplex structures viaHoogsteen hydrogen bonds and stabilize the micelle structure. The ODNmicelles' stabilites in the presence of albumin can be programmed bysimply alter the number of guanines. Albumin binds to lipid moiety ofunstabilized micelles (n≤2), in contrast, stabilized micelles (n>2)restrict the albumin binding and remain as micellar assemblies.

FIG. 3B is a schematic (top) and a bar graph (bottom) showing pyreneexcimer fluorescent constructs used to assay the stabilities ofG-quadruplex micelles in the presence of albumin.

FIG. 3C is a line graph showing the stability profiles of G-quadruplexCpG micelles as measured by size-exclusion chromatography in thepresence of fetal bovine serum (FBS).

FIG. 3D is a bar graph showing the percentage of B220+ cells, F4/80+cells, and CD11c+ cells that were CpG positive as determined by flowcytometry. ***, p<0.001; **, p<0.01; *, p<0.05.

FIG. 4A is a bar graph showing the percentage of peripheral bloodlymphocytes isolated from C57Bl/6 mice that are H-2K^(b)/SIINFEKLtetramer positive by flow cytometry 6 days after completion of animmunization protocol including s.c. injections on day 0 and day 14,with 10 μg OVA and in combinations of 1.24 nmol CpG formulations asindicated.

FIG. 4B is a bar graph showing quantifications of INF-γ and TNF-αpositive CD8 T-Cells after 6 hrs. antigen-specific restimulation.

FIG. 4C is a line graph showing the correlation between LN CpGfluorescence and immune response measured by SIINFEKL tetramer staining.

FIG. 4D is a bar graph showing the spleen weight (mg/g body weight) ofCpG, Lipo-G₂-CpG, and PBS as an indicator of relative systemic toxicityof the different treatments.

FIG. 4E is a schematic showing the assay design.

FIG. 4F is a dot plot showing the impact of LN targeting (Anti-OVA serumIgG titre 20 days after immunization with various antigen/adjuvantcombinations as indicated) on the immune response.

FIG. 5A is a bar graph showing the percentage of CD8+ cells isolatedfrom C57Bl/6 mice that were HPV-16 E7₄₉₋₅₇ positive by flow cytometry 6days after completion of an immunization protocol including s.c.injections on day 0 and day 14, with HPV-16 E7 minimal peptide (E7₄₉₋₅₇)and in combinations with 1.24 nmol CpG as indicated.

FIG. 5B is a bar graph showing quantifications of INF-γ and TNF-αpositive CD8 T-Cells after 6 hrs. antigen-specific restimulation as ameasure of the magnitude of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses forminimal peptides (Al11, Trp2, and HPV-16 E7).

FIG. 5C is a bar graph showing direct lipid conjugate to peptide(lipopeptide) does not elicit potent antigen-specific immune response asmeasured by the frequency of INF-γ and TNF-α positive CD8 T-Cells afterrestimulation.

FIG. 5D is a bar graph showing the potency of amphiphilic vaccine asassayed by in vivo cytotoxicity experiment on day 7 after the finalimmunization of Trp2 peptide vaccines.

FIG. 5E is a line graph showing tumor area for mice over time followingtreatment with subcutaneous (s.c.) TC-1 tumors treated by amphiphilicHPV-16 E7 peptide vaccine, soluble vaccine or no vaccine on day 6, 13and 19 after challenge with 3×10⁵ TC-1 cells. Statistically significantdifferences between amphiphilic vaccine and soluble vaccine-treatedgroups are indicated by asterisks. ***, p<0.001; **, p<0.01; *, p<0.05.All data are plotted as means plus or minus s.e.m. (n=3-8).

FIG. 5F is a Kaplan-Meier curve.

FIG. 6A is a bar graph showing the % OVA-specific CD8+ T cells followingtreatment with free CpG and MPLA, Lipo-G₆-CpG-MPLA, or Lipo-CpG-MPLA.

FIG. 6B is a bar graph showing the % TNF-α and INF-γ positive CD8+ Tcells following treatment with free CpG and MPLA, Lipo-G₆-CpG-MPLA, orLipo-CpG-MPLA.

FIG. 6C is a line graph showing the % OVA-specific CD8+ T cellsfollowing treatment with free CpG and MPLA, Lipo-G₆-CpG-MPLA, orLipo-CpG-MPLA over time.

FIG. 6D is a bar graph showing the % OVA-specific CD8+ T cells followingtreatment with free CpG and MPLA, Lipo-G₆-CpG-MPLA, or Lipo-CpG-MPLA inthe blood, spleen, and lymph node.

FIG. 7A is a schematic representation of an exemplary micelle formed byself-assembly of immunostimulatory conjugates, showing G-quadruplexstructure formed by Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding.

FIG. 7B is a graph showing size profile of the self-assembled micelles(diameter (nm)).

FIG. 7C is a line graph showing the results circular dichroism analysis(CD (mdeg)) of G-quadruplex stabilized micelles in 1×PBS/20 mM K⁺.

FIG. 8A is a bar graph showing quantitative accumulation (RadiantEfficiency) of various CpG-based micelles in the inguinal lymph nodes(left half of the graph) and axillary lymph nodes (right half of thegraph) 24 hours post injection.

FIG. 8B is a bar graph showing quantitative accumulation (RadiantEfficiency) of various CpG-based micelles in the inguinal lymph nodes(left half of the graph) and axillary lymph nodes (right half of thegraph) 72 hours post injection.

FIG. 9 is a schematic representation of a lipid-peptide conjugate.

FIGS. 10A-10D are Milliplex analyses of proinflammatory cytokineselicited in peripheral blood of mice immunized with a single dose (6.2nmol) of CpG formulations, blood samples were collect at different timeinterval and analyzed per manufacturer's instructions. Interferon gamma(FIG. 10A), TNF-alpha (FIG. 10B), IL6 (FIG. 10C), and IL12p40 (FIG.10D).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION I. Definitions

An immunostimulatory oligonucleotide, as used herein, is anoligonucleotide that can stimulate (e.g., induce or enhance) an immuneresponse.

As used herein, CG oligodeoxynucleotides (CG ODNs) are shortsingle-stranded synthetic DNA molecules that contain a cytosinenucleotide (C) followed by a guanine nucleotide (G).

By “immune cell” is meant a cell of hematopoietic origin and that playsa role in the immune response. Immune cells include lymphocytes (e.g., Bcells and T cells), natural killer cells, and myeloid cells (e.g.,monocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, andgranulocytes).

The term ‘T cell” refers to a CD4+ T cell or a CD8+ T cell. The term Tcell includes TH1 cells, TH2 cells and TH17 cells.

The term “T cell cytoxicity” includes any immune response that ismediated by CD8+ T cell activation. Exemplary immune responses includecytokine production, CD8+ T cell proliferation, granzyme or perforinproduction, and clearance of an infectious agent.

As generally used herein “pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to thosecompounds, materials, compositions, and/or dosage forms which are,within the scope of sound medical judgment, suitable for use in contactwith the tissues, organs, and/or bodily fluids of human beings andanimals without excessive toxicity, irritation, allergic response, orother problems or complications commensurate with a reasonablebenefit/risk ratio.

The terms “individual, “subject,” and “patient” refer to any individualwho is the target of treatment using the disclosed compositions. Thesubject can be a vertebrate, for example, a mammal. Thus, the subjectcan be a human. The subjects can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. Theterm does not denote a particular age or sex. Thus, adult and newbornsubjects, whether male or female, are intended to be covered. A subjectcan include a control subject or a test subject.

As used herein, the term “polypeptide” refers to a chain of amino acidsof any length, regardless of modification (e.g., phosphorylation orglycosylation).

The term “effective amount” or “therapeutically effective amount” meansa dosage sufficient to provide treatment for a disorder, disease, orcondition being treated, to induce or enhance an immune response, or tootherwise provide a desired pharmacologic and/or physiologic effect. Theprecise dosage will vary according to a variety of factors such assubject-dependent variables (e.g., age, immune system health, etc.), thedisease, the disease stage, and the treatment being effected.

The terms “individual,” “individual,” “subject,” and “patient” are usedinterchangeably herein, and refer to a mammal, including, but notlimited to, humans, rodents, such as mice and rats, and other laboratoryanimals.

The terms “oligonucleotide” or a “polynucleotide” are synthetic orisolated nucleic acid polymers including a plurality of nucleotidesubunits.

II. Compositions

The structural features of a lipid conjugate that control targeting ofthe conjugate to the lymph nodes have been discovered. Underphysiological conditions, amphiphilic lipid conjugates exist in a 3-wayequilibrium depicted in FIG. 2F. In pure water certain lipid conjugatesform micelles, but in the presence of serum and cells these amphiphilesequilibrate between binding to albumin and insertion of their lipophilictails into cell membranes.

As discussed in more detail below, lipid conjugates that effectivelytarget the lymph nodes typically include three domains: a lipophilicdomain that binds to albumin, a polar block domain, and a cargo such asa molecular adjuvant or immunostimulatory compound (such asoligonucleotide) or antigenic peptide. Depending on the cargo, thelength and compositions of the polar block can be tailored to push theequilibrium toward albumin binding, stable micelle formation, or cellinsertion. The design guidelines and compositions disclosed below can beused to induce or enhance robust immune responses with low systemictoxicity because the immunostimulating compounds are localized to thelymph node (i.e., lymph node-targeting conjugates) or the tissue at thelocal site of administration (i.e., micelle-stabilizing conjugate).

The effectiveness of any particular lipid conjugate to target the lymphnodes can be assayed based on the ability of albumin to disrupt micellesformed by a plurality of the conjugates in aqueous solution. Forexample, if an albumin containing agent such fetal bovine serum candisrupt 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75 percent or moreof the micelles formed in aqueous solution, the conjugate can beselected to target the lymph nodes. However, if 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50,55, 60, 65, 70, 75 percent or more of the micelles formed in aqueoussolution remain intact in the presence of albumin, the conjugate can beselected as a micelle-stabilizing conjugate.

A. Lymph Node-Targeted Conjugates

Lipid conjugates such as lipid-oligonucleotide and lipid-peptideconjugates for use in immunogenic compositions are disclosed. Lymphnode-targeting conjugates can be trafficked from the site ofadministration through the lymph to the lymph node where they accumulateand activate immune cells. It is believed that efficient lymph nodeaccumulation of lipid conjugates dependents on the ability of theamphiphile to partition from micelles into a serum protein-bound state.

Lymph node-targeting conjugates typically include three domains: ahighly lipophilic, albumin-binding domain (e.g., an albumin-bindinglipid), a cargo such as a molecular adjuvant or a peptide antigen, and apolar block linker, which promotes solubility of the conjugate andreduces the ability of the lipid to insert into cellular plasmamembranes. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the general structure ofthe conjugate is L-P-C, where “L” is an albumin-binding lipid, “P” is apolar block, and “C” is a cargo such as a molecular adjuvant or apolypeptide. In some embodiments, the cargo itself can also serve as thepolar block domain, and a separate polar block domain is not required.Therefore, in some embodiments the conjugate is only two domains:

an albumin-binding lipid and a cargo. For example, lipid-oligonucleotideconjugates can include an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide which isconjugated directly to a lipid, or is linked to a linker which isconjugated to a lipid. Lipid-peptide conjugates can include an antigenicpeptide which is conjugated directly to a lipid, or is linked to alinker which is conjugated to a lipid.

Lipid-conjugated peptides are well known (lipopeptides) as vaccineagents, but in our hands lipid conjugated directly to peptide does NOTexhibit lymph node targeting, because the conjugates are not solubleenough to partition preferentially onto albumin in the presence ofcells; they instead insert heavily into cell membranes and thus remaintrapped at an injection site.

Antigenic peptides directly conjugated to lipids (lipopeptides) havebeen extensively studied as a modality for enhancing vaccine efficacy(Jackson, et al in New Generation Vaccines (2011); Eriksson & JacksonCurr Protein Pept Sci 8, 412-417 (2007); BenMohamed, et al. The LancetInfectious Diseases 2, 425-431 (2002)). These molecules do not generallyexhibit lymph node targeting. This is illustrated by the data in FIGS.2G and H, where it is shown that a very short PEG linker attached to analbumin-binding diacyl tail leads to strong cell membrane insertion invitro (2G) and fails to accumulate to a significant degree in lymphnodes in vivo following subcutaneous injection (2H). Further, peptideantigens linked directly to albumin-binding diacyl tails elicit barelydetectable immune responses in vivo while lipo-PEG-peptides elicitrobust T-cell responses (FIG. 5C). A second distinction from previouslyreported lipopeptides is that the diacyl tails promoting lipid bindingand lymph node targeting here show no direct adjuvant activity on theirown, unlike lipopeptides such as pam3cys-peptide conjugates, that areknown to have adjuvant activity through binding to TLR-2 and otherimmunostimulatory receptors.

1. Lipids

The lipid conjugates disclosed herein typically include a hydrophobiclipid. The lipid can be linear, branched, or cyclic. The lipid ispreferably at least 17 to 18 carbons in length, but may be shorter if itshows good albumin binding and adequate targeting to the lymph nodes.

Lymph node-targeting conjugates include lipid-oligonucleotide conjugatesand lipid-peptide conjugates that can be trafficked from the site ofdelivery through the lymph to the lymph node. In preferred embodiments,the activity relies, in-part, on the ability of the conjugate toassociate with albumin in the blood of the subject. Therefore, lymphnode-targeted conjugates typically include a lipid that can bind toalbumin under physiological conditions. Lipids suitable for targetingthe lymph node can be selected based on the ability of the lipid or alipid conjugate including the lipid to bind to albumin. Suitable methodsfor testing the ability of the lipid or lipid conjugate to bind toalbumin are known in the art and discussed in the Examples below.

For example, in one embodiment, a plurality of lipid conjugates isallowed to spontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution. The micellesare incubated with albumin, or a solution including albumin such FetalBovine Serum (FBS). Samples can be analyzed, for example, by ELISA, sizeexclusion chromatography or other methods to determine if binding hasoccurred, as illustrated in FIG. 2B. Lipid conjugates can be selected aslymph node-targeting conjugates if in the presence of albumin, or asolution including albumin such Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), the micellesdissociate and the lipid conjugates bind to albumin as discussed above.

Examples of preferred lipids for use in lymph node targeting lipidconjugates include, but are not limited to fatty acids with aliphatictails of 8-30 carbons including, but not limited to, linear andunsaturatedsaturated fatty acids, branched saturated and unsaturatedfatty acids, and fatty acids derivatives, such as fatty acid esters,fatty acid amides, and fatty acid thioesters, diacyl lipids,Cholesterol, Cholesterol derivatives, and steroid acids such as bileacids; Lipid A or combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the lipid is a diacyl lipid or two-tailed lipid. Insome embodiments, the tails in the diacyl lipid contain from about 8 toabout 30 carbons and can be saturated, unsaturated, or combinationsthereof. The tails can be coupled to the head group via ester bondlinkages, amide bond linkages, thioester bond linkages, or combinationsthereof. In a particular embodiment, the diacyl lipids are phosphatelipids, glycolipids, sphingolipids, or combinations thereof.

Preferably, lymph node-targeting conjugates include a lipid that is 8 ormore carbon units in length. It is believed that increasing the numberof lipid units can reduce insertion of the lipid into plasma membrane ofcells, allowing the lipid conjugate to remain free to bind albumin andtraffic to the lymph node.

For example, the lipid can be a diacyl lipid composed of two C18hydrocarbon tails.

In some embodiments, the lipid for use in preparing lymph node targetinglipid conjugates is not a single chain hydrocarbon (e.g., C18), orcholesterol. Cholesterol conjugation has been explored to enhance theimmunomodulation of molecular adjuvants such as CpG and immunogenicityof peptides, but cholesterol conjugates, which associates well withlipoproteins but poorly with albumin, show poor lymph node targeting andlow immunogenicity in vaccines compared to optimal albumin-bindingconjugates (FIG. 2C).

2. Cargo

The cargo of the conjugates disclosed herein is a typically a molecularadjuvant such as an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide, or a peptideantigen. However, the cargo can also be other oligonucleotides,peptides, Toll-like receptor agonists or other immunomodulatorycompounds, dyes, MRI contrast agents, fluorophores or small moleculedrugs that require efficient trafficking to the lymph nodes.

a. Molecular Adjuvants

Lipid-oligonucleotide conjugates are disclosed. The oligonucleotideconjugates described herein typically contain an immunostimulatoryoligonucleotide.

In some embodiments, the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide can serve asa ligand for pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Examples of PRRsinclude the Toll-like family of signaling molecules that play a role inthe initiation of innate immune responses and also influence the laterand more antigen specific adaptive immune responses. Therefore, theoligonucleotide can serve as a ligand for a Toll-like family signalingmolecule, such as Toll-Like Receptor 9 (TLR9).

For example, unmethylated CpG sites can be detected by TLR9 onplasmacytoid dendritic cells and B cells in humans (Zaida, et al.,Infection and Immunity, 76(5):2123-2129, (2008)). Therefore, thesequence of oligonucleotide can include one or more unmethylatedcytosine-guanine (CG or CpG, used interchangeably) dinucleotide motifs.The ‘p’ refers to the phosphodiester backbone of DNA, as discussed inmore detail below, some oligonucleotides including CG can have amodified backbone, for example a phosphorothioate (PS) backbone.

In some embodiments, an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide can containmore than one CG dinucleotide, arranged either contiguously or separatedby intervening nucleotide(s). The CpG motif(s) can be in the interior ofthe oligonucleotide sequence. Numerous nucleotide sequences stimulateTLR9 with variations in the number and location of CG dinucleotide(s),as well as the precise base sequences flanking the CG dimers.

Typically, CG ODNs are classified based on their sequence, secondarystructures, and effect on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMCs). The five classes are Class A (Type D), Class B (Type K), ClassC, Class P, and Class S (Vollmer, J & Krieg, A M, Advanced drug deliveryreviews 61(3): 195-204 (2009), incorporated herein by reference). CGODNs can stimulate the production of Type I interferons (e.g., IFNα) andinduce the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs). Some classes of ODNs arealso strong activators of natural killer (NK) cells through indirectcytokine signaling. Some classes are strong stimulators of human B celland monocyte maturation (Weiner, G L, PNAS USA 94(20): 10833-7 (1997);Dalpke, A H, Immunology 106(1): 102-12 (2002); Hartmann, G, J of Immun.164(3):1617-2 (2000), each of which is incorporated herein byreference).

Other PRR Toll-like receptors include TLR3, and TLR7 which may recognizedouble-stranded RNA, single-stranded and short double-stranded RNAs,respectively, and retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors,namely RIG-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDAS),which are best known as RNA-sensing receptors in the cytosol. Therefore,in some embodiments, the oligonucleotide contains a functional ligandfor TLR3, TLR7, or RIG-I-like receptors, or combinations thereof.

Examples of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides, and methods of makingthem are known in the art, see for example, Bodera, P. Recent PatInflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 5(1):87-93 (2011), incorporated herein byreference.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide cargo includes two or moreimmunostimulatory sequences.

The oligonucleotide can be between 2-100 nucleotide bases in length,including for example, 5 nucleotide bases in length, 10 nucleotide basesin length, 15 nucleotide bases in length, 20 nucleotide bases in length,25 nucleotide bases in length, 30 nucleotide bases in length, 35nucleotide bases in length, 40 nucleotide bases in length, 45 nucleotidebases in length, 50 nucleotide bases in length, 60 nucleotide bases inlength, 70 nucleotide bases in length, 80 nucleotide bases in length, 90nucleotide bases in length, 95 nucleotide bases in length, 98 nucleotidebases in length, 100 nucleotide bases in length or more.

The 3′ end or the 5′ end of the oligonucleotides can be conjugated tothe polar block or the lipid. In a preferred embodiment the 5′ end ofthe oligonucleotide is linked to the polar block or the lipid.

The oligonucleotides can be DNA or RNA nucleotides which typicallyinclude a heterocyclic base (nucleic acid base), a sugar moiety attachedto the heterocyclic base, and a phosphate moiety which esterifies ahydroxyl function of the sugar moiety. The principal naturally-occurringnucleotides comprise uracil, thymine, cytosine, adenine and guanine asthe heterocyclic bases, and ribose or deoxyribose sugar linked byphosphodiester bonds.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotides are composed of nucleotideanalogs that have been chemically modified to improve stability,half-life, or specificity or affinity for a target receptor, relative toa DNA or RNA counterpart. The chemical modifications include chemicalmodification of nucleobases, sugar moieties, nucleotide linkages, orcombinations thereof. As used herein ‘modified nucleotide” or“chemically modified nucleotide” defines a nucleotide that has achemical modification of one or more of the heterocyclic base, sugarmoiety or phosphate moiety constituents. In some embodiments, the chargeof the modified nucleotide is reduced compared to DNA or RNAoligonucleotides of the same nucleobase sequence. For example, theoligonucleotide can have low negative charge, no charge, or positivecharge.

Typically, nucleoside analogs support bases capable of hydrogen bondingby Watson-Crick base pairing to standard polynucleotide bases, where theanalog backbone presents the bases in a manner to permit such hydrogenbonding in a sequence-specific fashion between the oligonucleotideanalog molecule and bases in a standard polynucleotide (e.g.,single-stranded RNA or single-stranded DNA). In some embodiments, theanalogs have a substantially uncharged, phosphorus containing backbone.

i. Heterocyclic Bases

The principal naturally-occurring nucleotides include uracil, thymine,cytosine, adenine and guanine as the heterocyclic bases. Theoligonucleotides can include chemical modifications to their nucleobaseconstituents. Chemical modifications of heterocyclic bases orheterocyclic base analogs may be effective to increase the bindingaffinity or stability in binding a target sequence. Chemically-modifiedheterocyclic bases include, but are not limited to, inosine,5-(1-propynyl) uracil (pU), 5-(1-propynyl) cytosine (pC),5-methylcytosine, 8-oxo-adenine, pseudocyto sine, pseudoisocytosine, 5and 2-amino-5-(2′-deoxy-.beta.-D-ribofuranosyl)pyridine(2-aminopyridine), and various pyrrolo- and pyrazolopyrimidinederivatives. Cyclic dinucleotides known to trigger cytosolic dangersensors such as STING could be used.

ii. Sugar Modifications

Oligonucleotides can also contain nucleotides with modified sugarmoieties or sugar moiety analogs. Sugar moiety modifications include,but are not limited to, 2′-O-aminoetoxy, 2′-O-amonioethyl (2′-OAE),2′-O-methoxy, 2′-O-methyl, 2-guanidoethyl (2′-OGE), 2′-0,4′-C-methylene(LNA), 2′-O-(methoxyethyl) (2′-OME) and 2′-O—(N-(methyl)acetamido)(2′-OMA). 2′-O-aminoethyl sugar moiety substitutions are especiallypreferred because they are protonated at neutral pH and thus suppressthe charge repulsion between the TFO and the target duplex. Thismodification stabilizes the C3′-endo conformation of the ribose ordexyribose and also forms a bridge with the i-1 phosphate in the purinestrand of the duplex.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is a morpholinooligonucleotide. Morpholino oligonucleotides are typically composed oftwo more morpholino monomers containing purine or pyrimidinebase-pairing moieties effective to bind, by base-specific hydrogenbonding, to a base in a polynucleotide, which are linked together byphosphorus-containing linkages, one to three atoms long, joining themorpholino nitrogen of one monomer to the 5′ exocyclic carbon of anadjacent monomer. The purine or pyrimidine base-pairing moiety istypically adenine, cytosine, guanine, uracil or thymine. The synthesis,structures, and binding characteristics of morpholino oligomers aredetailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,698,685, 5,217,866, 5,142,047, 5,034,506,5,166,315, 5,521,063, and 5,506,337.

Important properties of the morpholino-based subunits typically include:the ability to be linked in a oligomeric form by stable, unchargedbackbone linkages; the ability to support a nucleotide base (e.g.adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymidine, uracil or inosine) such that thepolymer formed can hybridize with a complementary-base target nucleicacid, including target RNA, with high T_(m), even with oligomers asshort as 10-14 bases; the ability of the oligomer to be activelytransported into mammalian cells; and the ability of an oligomer:RNAheteroduplex to resist RNAse degradation.

In some embodiments, oligonucleotides employ morpholino-based subunitsbearing base-pairing moieties, joined by uncharged linkages, asdescribed above.

iii. Internucleotide Linkages

Oligonucleotides connected by an internucleotide bond that refers to achemical linkage between two nucleoside moieties. Modifications to thephosphate backbone of DNA or RNA oligonucleotides may increase thebinding affinity or stability oligonucleotides, or reduce thesuseptability of oligonucleotides nuclease digestion. Cationicmodifications, including, but not limited to, diethyl-ethylenediamide(DEED) or dimethyl-aminopropylamine (DMAP) may be especially useful dueto decrease electrostatic repulsion between the oligonucleotide and atarget. Modifications of the phosphate backbone may also include thesubstitution of a sulfur atom for one of the non-bridging oxygens in thephosphodiester linkage. This substitution creates a phosphorothioateinternucleoside linkage in place of the phosphodiester linkage.Oligonucleotides containing phosphorothioate internucleoside linkageshave been shown to be more stable in vivo.

Examples of modified nucleotides with reduced charge include modifiedinternucleotide linkages such as phosphate analogs having achiral anduncharged intersubunit linkages (e.g., Sterchak, E. P. et al., OrganicChem., 52:4202, (1987)), and uncharged morpholino-based polymers havingachiral intersubunit linkages (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506), asdiscussed above. Some internucleotide linkage analogs includemorpholidate, acetal, and polyamide-linked heterocycles.

In another embodiment, the oligonucleotides are composed of lockednucleic acids. Locked nucleic acids (LNA) are modified RNA nucleotides(see, for example, Braasch, et al., Chem. Biol., 8(1):1-7 (2001)). LNAsform hybrids with DNA which are more stable than DNA/DNA hybrids, aproperty similar to that of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)/DNA hybrids.Therefore, LNA can be used just as PNA molecules would be. LNA bindingefficiency can be increased in some embodiments by adding positivecharges to it. Commercial nucleic acid synthesizers and standardphosphoramidite chemistry are used to make LNAs.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotides are composed of peptidenucleic acids. Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are synthetic DNA mimics inwhich the phosphate backbone of the oligonucleotide is replaced in itsentirety by repeating N-(2-aminoethyl)-glycine units and phosphodiesterbonds are typically replaced by peptide bonds. The various heterocyclicbases are linked to the backbone by methylene carbonyl bonds. PNAsmaintain spacing of heterocyclic bases that is similar to conventionalDNA oligonucleotides, but are achiral and neutrally charged molecules.Peptide nucleic acids are comprised of peptide nucleic acid monomers.

Other backbone modifications include peptide and amino acid variationsand modifications. Thus, the backbone constituents of oligonucleotidessuch as PNA may be peptide linkages, or alternatively, they may benon-peptide peptide linkages. Examples include acetyl caps, aminospacers such as 8-amino-3,6-dioxaoctanoic acid (referred to herein asO-linkers), amino acids such as lysine are particularly useful ifpositive charges are desired in the PNA, and the like. Methods for thechemical assembly of PNAs are well known. See, for example, U.S. Pat.Nos. 5,539,082, 5,527,675, 5,623,049, 5,714,331, 5,736,336, 5,773,571and 5,786,571.

Oligonucleotides optionally include one or more terminal residues ormodifications at either or both termini to increase stability, and/oraffinity of the oligonucleotide for its target. Commonly used positivelycharged moieties include the amino acids lysine and arginine, althoughother positively charged moieties may also be useful. Oligonucleotidesmay further be modified to be end capped to prevent degradation using apropylamine group. Procedures for 3′ or 5′ capping oligonucleotides arewell known in the art.

In some embodiments, the oligonucleotide is single-stranded DNA,single-stranded RNA, or double-stranded RNA.

b. Peptide Antigens

Lipid-peptide conjugates are disclosed. The peptide conjugates describedherein typically include an antigenic protein or polypeptide.

The peptide can be 2-100 amino acids (aa), including for example, 5amino acids, 10 amino acids, 15 amino acids, 20 amino acids, 25 aminoacids, 30 amino acids, 35 amino acids, 40 amino acids, 45 amino acids,or 50 amino acids. In some embodiments, a peptide can be greater than 50amino acids. In some embodiments, the peptide can be >100 amino acids.

A protein/peptide can be linear, branched or cyclic. The peptide caninclude D amino acids, L amino acids, or a combination thereof. Thepeptide or protein can be conjugated to the polar block or lipid at theN-terminus or the C-terminus of the peptide or protein.

The protein or polypeptide can be any protein or peptide that can induceor increase the ability of the immune system to develop antibodies andT-cell responses to the protein or peptide. Examples of specific peptideand protein antigens that can be used in the lipid-peptide conjugatesdisclosed herein are discussed in more detail below with respect topreferred antigens that can be used in vaccine formulations.

Lipid-protein-based micelles can be formed in an aqueous solution byself-assembly of conjugates containing a peptide antigen linked(attached) to a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety or derivative or analogthereof, which is linked to hydrophobic lipid.

c. Other Cargos

Generally, the cargo can include therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnosticagents. For example, chemotherapy drugs are of interest for targetingtumors as albumin is known to accumulate in tumors by the EPR effect andalso by fast metabolism in tumors.

In some embodiments, the lipid conjugates disclosed herein include adetection label, for example, a fluorophore such as fluorescein orrhodamine, Alexa Fluor dyes, DyLight Fluor dyes, Quasar and Cal Fluordyes, cyanine dyes (Cy3, Cy5, Cy5.5, Cy7) or other fluorescent dyes. Thelabel can be the cargo, or can be in addition to a cargo.

3. Polar Block/Linker

For the conjugate to be trafficked efficiently to the lymph node, theconjugate should remain soluble. Therefore, a polar block linker can beincluded between the cargo and the lipid to increase solubility of theconjugate. The polar block reduces or prevents the ability of the lipidto insert into the plasma membrane of cells, such as cells in the tissueadjacent to the injection site. The polar block can also reduce orprevent the ability of cargo, such as synthetic oligonucleotidescontaining a PS backbone, from non-specifically associating withextracellular matrix proteins at the site of administration. The polarblock increases the solubility of the conjugate without preventing itsability to bind to albumin. It is believed that this combination ofcharacteristics allows the conjugate to bind to albumin present in theserum or interstitial fluid, and remain in circulation until the albuminis trafficked to, and retained in a lymph node.

The length and composition of the polar block can be adjusted based onthe lipid and cargo selected. For example, for oligonucleotideconjugates, the oligonucleotide itself may be polar enough to insuresolubility of the conjugate, for example, oligonucleotides that are 10,15, 20 or more nucleotides in length. Therefore, in some embodiments, noadditional polar block linker is required. However, depending on theamino acid sequence, some lipidated peptides can be essentiallyinsoluble. In these cases, it can be desirable to include a polar blockthat mimics the effect of a polar oligonucleotide.

A polar block can be used as part of any of lipid conjugates describedherein, for example, lipid-oligonucleotide conjugates and lipid-peptideconjugates, which reduce cell membrane insertion/preferential portioningont albumin. Suitable polar blocks include, but are not limited to,oligonucleotides such as those discussed above, a hydrophilic polymerincluding but not limited to poly(ethylene glycol) (MW: 500 Da to 20,000Da), polyacrylamide (MW: 500 Da to 20,000 Da), polyacrylic acid; astring of hydrophilic amino acids such as serine, threonine, cysteine,tyrosine, asparagine, glutamine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, lysine,arginine, histidine, or combinations thereof; polysaccharides, includingbut not limited to, dextran (MW: 1,000 Da to 2,000,000 Da), orcombinations thereof.

The hydrophobic lipid and the linker/cargo are covalently linked. Thecovalent bond may be a non-cleavable linkage or a cleavable linkage. Thenon-cleavable linkage can include an amide bond or phosphate bond, andthe cleavable linkage can include a disulfide bond, acid-cleavablelinkage, ester bond, anhydride bond, biodegradable bond, orenzyme-cleavable linkage.

i. Ethylene Glycol Linkers

In a preferred embodiment, the polar block is one or more ethyleneglycol (EG) units, more preferably 2 or more EG units (i.e.,polyethylene glycol (PEG)). For example, in some embodiments, a peptideconjugate includes a protein or peptide (e.g., peptide antigen) and ahydrophobic lipid linked by a polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule or aderivative or analog thereof.

In some embodiments, protein conjugates described herein contain proteinantigen linked to PEG which is in turn linked to a hydrophobic lipid, orlipid-Gn-ON conjugates, either covalently or via formation ofprotein-oligo conjugates that hybridize to oligo micelles.

The precise number of EG units depends on the lipid and the cargo,however, typically, a polar block can have between about 1 and about100, between about 20 and about 80, between about 30 and about 70, orbetween about 40 and about 60 EG units. In some embodiments, the polarblock has between about 45 and 55 EG, units. For example, in onepreferred embodiment, the polar block has 48 EG units.

ii. Oligonucleotide Linkers

As discussed above, in some embodiments, the polar block is anoligonucleotide. The polar block liner can be have any sequence, forexample, the sequence of the oligonucleotide can be a random sequence,or a sequence specifically chosen for its molecular or biochemicalproperties (e.g., highly polar). In some embodiments, the polar blocklinker includes one or more series of consecutive adenine (A), cytosine(C), guanine (G), thymine (T), uracil (U), or analog thereof. In someembodiments, the polar block linker consists of a series of consecutiveadenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), thymine (T), uracil (U), oranalog thereof.

In one embodiment, the linker is one or more guanines, for examplebetween 1-10 guanines. It has been discovered that altering the numberof guanines between a cargo such as a CpG oligonucleotide, and a lipidtail controls micelle stability in the presence of serum proteins.Therefore, the number of guanines in the linker can be selected based onthe desired affinity of the conjugate for serum proteins such asalbumin. As illustrated in the Examples below, when the cargo is a CpGimmunostimulatory oligonucleotide and the lipid tail is a diacyl lipid,the number of guanines affects the ability of micelles formed in aqueoussolution to dissociate in the presence of serum: 20% of thenon-stabilized micelles (lipo-G₀T₁₀-CG) were intact, while the remaining80% were disrupted and bonded with FBS components. In the presence ofguanines, the percentage of intact micelles increased from 36%(lipo-G₂T₈-CG) to 73% (lipo-G₄T₆-CG), and finally reached 90%(lipo-G₆T₄-CG). Increasing the number of guanines to eight(lipo-G₈T₂-CG) and ten (lipo-G₁₀T₀-CG) did not further enhance micellestability.

Therefore, in a preferred embodiment, the linker in a lymphnode-targeting conjugate can include 0, 1, or 2 guanines. As discussedin more detail below, linkers that include 3 or more consecutiveguanines can be used to form micelle-stabilizing conjugates withproperties that are well suited for local applications at or near thesite of administration.

B. Micelle-Stabilizing Conjugates

Micelle-stabilizing conjugates include conjugates such aslipid-oligonucleotide conjugates and lipid-peptide conjugates thataccumulate in the tissue surrounding the site of delivery. Theconjugates typically do not bind to albumin. In some embodiments, thelipid used to prepare a micelle-stabilizing lipid conjugate is the sameas the lipid used in the lymph node targeting lipid conjugates discussedabove, and the ability to resist binding to albumin is controlled by themolecular or biochemical properties of the cargo, the linker, or acombination thereof. In some embodiments, lipids that would not beeffective for use in lymph node targeted conjugates are useful inmicelle-stabilizing conjugates because the micelle-stabilizingconjugates do not necessarily have to bind to albumin.

Micelle-stabilizing conjugates can be selected based on the ability tospontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution that are not disruptedby serum components such as albumin, as discussed above. Suitablemethods for testing the ability of the lipid or lipid conjugates to bindto albumin are known in the art and discussed in the Examples below. Forexample, in one embodiment, a plurality of lipid conjugates is allowedto spontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution. The micelles areincubated with albumin, or a solution including albumin such FetalBovine Serum (FBS). Samples can be analyzed, for example, by ELISA, sizeseparation chromatography or other methods to determine if binding hasoccurred. Lipid conjugates can be selected as micelle stabilizedconjugates if in the presence of albumin, or a solution includingalbumin such Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), the micelles remain intact andthe lipid conjugates do not bind to albumin.

Examples of preferred lipids for use in micelle-stabilizing lipidconjugates include, but are not limited to fatty acids with aliphatictails of 8-30 carbons including, but not limited to, linear andunsaturated and saturated fatty acids, branched saturated andunsaturated fatty acids, and fatty acids derivatives, such as fatty acidesters, fatty acid amides, and fatty acid thioesters, diacyl lipids,Cholesterol, Cholesterol derivatives, and steroid acids such as bileacids; Lipid A or combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, the lipid is a diacyl lipid or two-tailed lipid. Insome embodiments, the tails in the diacyl lipid contain from about 8 toabout 30 carbons and can be saturated, unsaturated, or combinationsthereof. The tails can be coupled to the head group via ester bondlinkages, amide bond linkages, thioester bond linkages, or combinationsthereof. In a particular embodiment, the diacyl lipids are phosphatelipids, glycolipids, sphingolipids, or combinations thereof.

As discussed above, in some embodiments, the stability of micelles inthe presence of albumin is affected by the linker. For example, anoligonucleotide, such as an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide, and thelipid can be linked by three or more intervening guanine nucleotides.The nucleotides can be positioned at the 5′ end of the oligonucleotide.Guanine-rich DNA sequences can form quadruplex structures via hydrogenbonding, where the oligoguanines molecularly “glue” together fourindividual guanine-rich DNA sequences. Thus, the immunostimulatoryoligonucleotide conjugates can self-assemble into “G-quadruplexes,”which then assemble to form micelles having a hydrophobic lipid core anda nucleic acid corona. As illustrated in the Examples below, kineticstability of a micelle can be controlled by altering the number ofguanine nucleotides that link the hydrophobic lipid to theimmunostimulatory oligonucleotide. In some embodiments, theimmunostimulatory oligonucleotide and the hydrophobic lipid are linkedby a single guanine at the 5′ end of the oligonucleotide, while in otherembodiments, the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide and the hydrophobiclipid are linked by two guanines at the 5′ end of the oligonucleotide.In some embodiments, the intervening oligoguanine (G_(n)) contains threeto ten guanines (n=3-10).

The cargo of micelle-stabilizing conjugates can includes any of thecargo discussed above with respect to lymph node targeted conjugates, aswell as small molecules, oligonucleotide, or peptide therapeutics (i.e.,any cargo that would one of skill in the art would select foraccumulation at a site of local delivery).

Micelle-stabilizing conjugates can form micelles spontaneously inaqueous solution by self-assembly. The micelle has a hydrophobic lipidcore and a hydrophilic surface. Formation of a micelle in an aqueousenvironment (e.g., water, buffer) is driven by hydrophobic interactions,and the micelle is stabilized by formation of the G-quadruplexes asdescribed above. A micelle is further stabilized by the presence of acation, such as potassium (K⁺), in the aqueous environment. The cationconnects two G-quadruplexes and minimizes the electrostatic interactionsbetween the immunostimulatory oligonucleotides. Guanine-richoligonucleotide sequences can fold into various types of structures(e.g., intramolecular, intermolecular, parallel, and antiparallel)(Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43, 668-698 (2004)). Tofacilitate micelle self-assembly and to minimize oligonucleotidefolding, the lipid-oligonucleotide conjugates can be suspended in purewater to permit assembly of the micelle, and then potassium-containingbuffer can be added to stabilize the G-quadruplexes.

In some embodiments, micelles of a homogeneous micelle population aresubstantially uniform in size. As used herein, micelles of a“homogeneous” population each are similarly composed of the same type oflipid-oligonucleotide conjugate (e.g., a L-5′-G_(n)-CG-ODN-3′conjugate).

As discussed above, the stability of the micelle can be controlled byaltering the number of guanine nucleotides in the polar block. Forexample, in some embodiments, the conjugate includes one or more guaninenucleotides at the 5′ end of the oligonucleotide and hydrophobic lipidlinked to the most 5′ guanine. Micelle “stability” as used herein refersto resistance to disassembly or changes in micelle size in the presenceof serum, albumins, or other proteins or lipids, and/or resistance ofthe micelles to changes in size or composition in the presence of cells.

The diameter of a micelle as described herein can be from about 3 nm toabout 100 nm. In some embodiments, the diameter of a micelle is 3 nm, 4nm, 5 nm, 6 nm, 7 nm, 8 nm, 9 nm, 10 nm, 11 nm, 12 nm, 13 nm, 14 nm, 15nm, 16 nm, 17 nm, 18 nm, 20 nm, 21 nm, 22 nm, 23 nm, 24 nm, 25 nm, 26nm, 27 nm, 28 nm, 29 nm, 30 nm, 31 nm, 32 nm, 33 nm, 34 nm, 35 nm, 36nm, 37 nm, 38 nm, 39 nm, 40 nm, 41 nm, 42 nm, 43 nm, 44 nm, 45 nm, 46nm, 47 nm, 48 nm, 49 nm, 50 nm, 51 nm, 52 nm, 53 nm, 54 nm, 55 nm, 56nm, 57 nm, 58 nm, 59 nm, 60 nm, 61 nm, 62 nm, 63 nm, 64 nm, 65 nm, 66nm, 67 nm, 68 nm, 69 nm, 70 nm, 71 nm, 72 nm, 73 nm, 74 nm, 75 nm, 76nm, 77 nm, 78 nm, 79 nm, 80 nm, 81 nm, 82 nm, 83 nm, 84 nm, 85 nm, 86nm, 87 nm, 88 nm, 89 nm, 90 nm, 91 nm, 92 nm, 93 nm, 94 nm, 95 nm, 96nm, 97 nm, 98 nm, 99 nm, or 100 nm. In some embodiments, the diameter ofa micelle is about 20 nm or about 50 nm.

III. Formulations

A. Pharmaceutical Compositions

Pharmaceutical compositions including lipid conjugates are provided.Pharmaceutical compositions can be for administration by parenteral(intramuscular, intraperitoneal, intravenous (IV) or subcutaneousinjection), transdermal (either passively or using iontophoresis orelectroporation), or transmucosal (nasal, vaginal, rectal, orsublingual) routes of administration or using bioerodible inserts andcan be formulated in dosage forms appropriate for each route ofadministration.

In some embodiments, the compositions are administered systemically, forexample, by intravenous or intraperitoneal administration, in an amounteffective for delivery of the compositions to targeted cells. Otherpossible routes include trans-dermal or oral.

In certain embodiments, the compositions are administered locally, forexample by injection directly into a site to be treated. In someembodiments, the compositions are injected or otherwise administereddirectly to one or more tumors. Typically, local injection causes anincreased localized concentration of the compositions which is greaterthan that which can be achieved by systemic administration. In someembodiments, the compositions are delivered locally to the appropriatecells by using a catheter or syringe. Other means of delivering suchcompositions locally to cells include using infusion pumps (for example,from Alza Corporation, Palo Alto, Calif.) or incorporating thecompositions into polymeric implants (see, for example, P. Johnson andJ. G. Lloyd-Jones, eds., Drug Delivery Systems (Chichester, England:Ellis Horwood Ltd., 1987), which can effect a sustained release of thenanolipogels to the immediate area of the implant.

As further studies are conducted, information will emerge regardingappropriate dosage levels for treatment of various conditions in variouspatients, and the ordinary skilled worker, considering the therapeuticcontext, age, and general health of the recipient, will be able toascertain proper dosing. The selected dosage depends upon the desiredtherapeutic effect, on the route of administration, and on the durationof the treatment desired. Generally dosage levels of 0.001 to 10 mg/kgof body weight daily are administered to mammals. Generally, forintravenous injection or infusion, dosage may be lower.

1. Formulations for Parenteral Administration

In a preferred embodiment the lipid conjugates are administered in anaqueous solution, by parenteral injection. In some embodiments, thecomposition includes albumin, or other serum proteins.

The formulation can be in the form of a suspension or emulsion. Ingeneral, pharmaceutical compositions are provided including an effectiveamount of the conjugate and optionally include pharmaceuticallyacceptable diluents, preservatives, solubilizers, emulsifiers, adjuvantsand/or carriers. Such compositions can include diluents sterile water,buffered saline of various buffer content (e.g., Tris-HCl, acetate,phosphate), pH and ionic strength; and optionally, additives such asdetergents and solubilizing agents (e.g., TWEEN® 20, TWEEN® 80 alsoreferred to as polysorbate 20 or 80), anti-oxidants (e.g., ascorbicacid, sodium metabisulfite), and preservatives (e.g., Thimersol, benzylalcohol) and bulking substances (e.g., lactose, mannitol). Examples ofnon-aqueous solvents or vehicles are propylene glycol, polyethyleneglycol, vegetable oils, such as olive oil and corn oil, gelatin, andinjectable organic esters such as ethyl oleate. The formulations may belyophilized and redissolved/resuspended immediately before use. Theformulation may be sterilized by, for example, filtration through abacteria retaining filter, by incorporating sterilizing agents into thecompositions, by irradiating the compositions, or by heating thecompositions.

2. Formulations for Topical and Mucosal Administration

The lipid conjugates can be applied topically. Topical administrationcan include application to the lungs (pulmonary), nasal, oral(sublingual, buccal), vaginal, or rectal mucosa. In some cases, theconjugates may be transcytosed on albumin across mucosal barriers

Compositions can be delivered to the lungs while inhaling and traverseacross the lung epithelial lining to the blood stream when deliveredeither as an aerosol or spray dried particles having an aerodynamicdiameter of less than about 5 microns.

A wide range of mechanical devices designed for pulmonary delivery oftherapeutic products can be used, including but not limited tonebulizers, metered dose inhalers, and powder inhalers, all of which arefamiliar to those skilled in the art. Some specific examples ofcommercially available devices are the Ultravent® nebulizer(Mallinckrodt Inc., St. Louis, Mo.); the Acorn® II nebulizer (MarquestMedical Products, Englewood, Colo.); the Ventolin® metered dose inhaler(Glaxo Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C.); and the Spinhaler® powderinhaler (Fisons Corp., Bedford, Mass.). Nektar, Alkermes and Mannkindall have inhalable insulin powder preparations approved or in clinicaltrials where the technology could be applied to the formulationsdescribed herein.

Formulations for administration to the mucosa will typically be spraydried drug particles, which may be incorporated into a tablet, gel,capsule, suspension or emulsion. Standard pharmaceutical excipients areavailable from any formulator. Oral formulations may be in the form ofchewing gum, gel strips, tablets, capsules, or lozenges.

Transdermal formulations may also be prepared. These will typically beointments, lotions, sprays, or patches, all of which can be preparedusing standard technology. Transdermal formulations can includepenetration enhancers.

B. Immunogenic Compositions

The conjugates disclosed herein can be used in immunogenic compositionsor as components in vaccines. Typically, immunogenic compositionsdisclosed herein include an adjuvant, an antigen, or a combinationthereof. The combination of an adjuvant and an antigen can be referredto as a vaccine. When administered to a subject in combination, theadjuvant and antigen can be administered in separate pharmaceuticalcompositions, or they can be administered together in the samepharmaceutical composition. When administered in combination, theadjuvant can be a lipid conjugate, the antigen can be a lipid conjugate,or the adjuvant and the antigen can both be lipid conjugates.

1. Antigens

An immunogenic composition can include a lipid conjugate that is anadjuvant such as an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide-lipid conjugate,administered alone, or in combination with an antigen. Antigens can bepeptides, proteins, polysaccharides, saccharides, lipids, nucleic acids,or combinations thereof. The antigen can be derived from a virus,bacterium, parasite, plant, protozoan, fungus, tissue or transformedcell such as a cancer or leukemic cell and can be a whole cell orimmunogenic component thereof, e.g., cell wall components or molecularcomponents thereof.

Suitable antigens are known in the art and are available from commercialgovernment and scientific sources. In one embodiment, the antigens arewhole inactivated or attenuated organisms. These organisms may beinfectious organisms, such as viruses, parasites and bacteria. Theseorganisms may also be tumor cells. The antigens may be purified orpartially purified polypeptides derived from tumors or viral orbacterial sources. The antigens can be recombinant polypeptides producedby expressing DNA encoding the polypeptide antigen in a heterologousexpression system. The antigens can be DNA encoding all or part of anantigenic protein. The DNA may be in the form of vector DNA such asplasmid DNA.

Antigens may be provided as single antigens or may be provided incombination. Antigens may also be provided as complex mixtures ofpolypeptides or nucleic acids. Exemplary antigens are provided below.

a. Viral Antigens

A viral antigen can be isolated from any virus including, but notlimited to, a virus from any of the following viral families:Arenaviridae, Arterivirus, Astroviridae, Baculoviridae, Badnavirus,Barnaviridae, Birnaviridae, Bromoviridae, Bunyaviridae, Caliciviridae,Capillovirus, Carlavirus, Caulimovirus, Circoviridae, Closterovirus,Comoviridae, Coronaviridae (e.g., Coronavirus, such as severe acuterespiratory syndrome (SARS) virus), Corticoviridae, Cystoviridae,Deltavirus, Dianthovirus, Enamovirus, Filoviridae (e.g., Marburg virusand Ebola virus (e.g., Zaire, Reston, Ivory Coast, or Sudan strain)),Flaviviridae, (e.g., Hepatitis C virus, Dengue virus 1, Dengue virus 2,Dengue virus 3, and Dengue virus 4), Hepadnaviridae, Herpesviridae(e.g., Human herpesvirus 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, and Cytomegalovirus),Hypoviridae, Iridoviridae, Leviviridae, Lipothrixviridae, Microviridae,Orthomyxoviridae (e.g., Influenzavirus A and B and C), Papovaviridae,Paramyxoviridae (e.g., measles, mumps, and human respiratory syncytialvirus), Parvoviridae, Picornaviridae (e.g., poliovirus, rhinovirus,hepatovirus, and aphthovirus), Poxviridae (e.g., vaccinia and smallpoxvirus), Reoviridae (e.g., rotavirus), Retroviridae (e.g., lentivirus,such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 and HIV 2), Rhabdoviridae(for example, rabies virus, measles virus, respiratory syncytial virus,etc.), Togaviridae (for example, rubella virus, dengue virus, etc.), andTotiviridae. Suitable viral antigens also include all or part of Dengueprotein M, Dengue protein E, Dengue D1NS1, Dengue D1NS2, and DengueD1NS3.

Viral antigens may be derived from a particular strain such as apapilloma virus, a herpes virus, e.g., herpes simplex 1 and 2; ahepatitis virus, for example, hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus(HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), the delta hepatitis D virus (HDV),hepatitis E virus (HEV) and hepatitis G virus (HGV), the tick-borneencephalitis viruses; parainfluenza, varicella-zoster, cytomeglavirus,Epstein-Barr, rotavirus, rhinovirus, adenovirus, coxsackieviruses,equine encephalitis, Japanese encephalitis, yellow fever, Rift Valleyfever,and lymphocytic choriomeningitis.

b. Bacterial Antigens

Bacterial antigens can originate from any bacteria including, but notlimited to, Actinomyces, Anabaena, Bacillus, Bacteroides, Bdellovibrio,Bordetella, Borrelia, Campylobacter, Caulobacter, Chlamydia, Chlorobium,Chromatium, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Cytophaga, Deinococcus,Escherichia, Francisella, Halobacterium, Heliobacter, Haemophilus,Hemophilus influenza type B (HIB), Hyphomicrobium, Legionella,Leptspirosis, Listeria, Meningococcus A, B and C, Methanobacterium,Micrococcus, Myobacterium, Mycoplasma, Myxococcus, Neisseria,Nitrobacter, Oscillatoria, Prochloron, Proteus, Pseudomonas,Phodospirillum, Rickettsia, Salmonella, Shigella, Spirillum,Spirochaeta, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Streptomyces, Sulfolobus,Thermoplasma, Thiobacillus, and Treponema, Vibrio, and Yersinia.

c. Parasite Antigens

Parasite antigens can be obtained from parasites such as, but notlimited to, an antigen derived from Cryptococcus neoformans, Histoplasmacapsulatum, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Nocardia asteroides,Rickettsia ricketsii, Rickettsia typhi, Mycoplasma pneumoniae,Chlamydial psittaci, Chlamydial trachomatis, Plasmodium falciparum,Trypanosoma brucei, Entamoeba histolytica, Toxoplasma gondii,Trichomonas vaginalis and Schistosoma mansoni. These include Sporozoanantigens, Plasmodian antigens, such as all or part of a Circumsporozoiteprotein, a Sporozoite surface protein, a liver stage antigen, an apicalmembrane associated protein, or a Merozoite surface protein.

d. Allergens and Environmental Antigens

The antigen can be an allergen or environmental antigen, such as, butnot limited to, an antigen derived from naturally occurring allergenssuch as pollen allergens (tree-, herb, weed-, and grass pollenallergens), insect allergens (inhalant, saliva and venom allergens),animal hair and dandruff allergens, and food allergens. Important pollenallergens from trees, grasses and herbs originate from the taxonomicorders of Fagales, Oleales, Pinales and platanaceae including i.a. birch(Betula), alder (Alnus), hazel (Corylus), hornbeam (Carpinus) and olive(Olea), cedar (Cryptomeriaand Juniperus), Plane tree (Platanus), theorder of Poales including e.g., grasses of the genera Lolium, Phleum,Poa, Cynodon, Dactylis, Holcus, Phalaris, Secale, and Sorghum, theorders of Asterales and Urticales including i.a. herbs of the generaAmbrosia, Artemisia, and Parietaria. Other allergen antigens that may beused include allergens from house dust mites of the genusDermatophagoides and Euroglyphus, storage mite e.g Lepidoglyphys,Glycyphagus and Tyrophagus, those from cockroaches, midges and flease.g. Blatella, Periplaneta, Chironomus and Ctenocepphalides, those frommammals such as cat, dog and horse, birds, venom allergens includingsuch originating from stinging or biting insects such as those from thetaxonomic order of Hymenoptera including bees (superfamily Apidae),wasps (superfamily Vespidea), and ants (superfamily Formicoidae). Stillother allergen antigens that may be used include inhalation allergensfrom fungi such as from the genera Alternaria and Cladosporium.

e. Cancer Antigens

A cancer antigen is an antigen that is typically expressedpreferentially by cancer cells (i.e., it is expressed at higher levelsin cancer cells than on non-cancer cells) and in some instances it isexpressed solely by cancer cells. The cancer antigen may be expressedwithin a cancer cell or on the surface of the cancer cell. The cancerantigen can be MART-1/Melan-A, gp100, adenosine deaminase-bindingprotein (ADAbp), FAP, cyclophilin b, colorectal associated antigen(CRC)-C017-1A/GA733, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CAP-1, CAP-2, etv6,AML1, prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA-1, PSA-2, PSA-3,prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), T cell receptor/CD3-zetachain, and CD20. The cancer antigen may be selected from the groupconsisting of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A2, MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, MAGE-A5, MAGE-A6,MAGE-A7, MAGE-A8, MAGE-A9, MAGE-A10, MAGE-A11, MAGE-Al2, MAGE-Xp2(MAGE-B2), MAGE-Xp3 (MAGE-B3), MAGE-Xp4 (MAGE-B4), MAGE-C1, MAGE-C2,MAGE-C3, MAGE-C4, MAGE-C5), GAGE-1, GAGE-2, GAGE-3, GAGE-4, GAGE-5,GAGE-6, GAGE-7, GAGE-8, GAGE-9, BAGE, RAGE, LAGE-1, NAG, GnT-V, MUM-1,CDK4, tyrosinase, p53, MUC family, HER2/neu, p21ras, RCAS1,α-fetoprotein, E-cadherin, α-catenin, β-catenin, γ-catenin, p120ctn,gp100Pmel117, PRAME, NY-ESO-1, cdc27, adenomatous polyposis coli protein(APC), fodrin, Connexin 37, Ig-idiotype, p15, gp75, GM2 ganglioside, GD2ganglioside, human papilloma virus proteins, Smad family of tumorantigens, lmp-1, PIA, EBV-encoded nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1, brainglycogen phosphorylase, SSX-1, SSX-2 (HOM-MEL-40), SSX-1, SSX-4, SSX-5,SCP-1 and CT-7, CD20, or c-erbB-2.

2. Adjuvants

An immunogenic composition can include a lipid conjugate that is anantigen such as an antigenic polypeptide-lipid conjugate, administeredalone, or in combination with an adjuvant.

The adjuvant may be without limitation alum (e.g., aluminum hydroxide,aluminum phosphate); saponins purified from the bark of the Q. saponariatree such as QS21 (a glycolipid that elutes in the 21st peak with HPLCfractionation; Antigenics, Inc., Worcester, Mass.);poly[di(carboxylatophenoxy)phosphazene (PCPP polymer; Virus ResearchInstitute, USA), Flt3 ligand, Leishmania elongation factor (a purifiedLeishmania protein; Corixa Corporation, Seattle, Wash.), ISCOMS(immunostimulating complexes which contain mixed saponins, lipids andform virus-sized particles with pores that can hold antigen; CSL,Melbourne, Australia), Pam3Cys, SB-AS4 (SmithKline Beecham adjuvantsystem #4 which contains alum and MPL; SBB, Belgium), non-ionic blockcopolymers that form micelles such as CRL 1005 (these contain a linearchain of hydrophobic polyoxypropylene flanked by chains ofpolyoxyethylene, Vaxcel, Inc., Norcross, Ga.), and Montanide IMS (e.g.,IMS 1312, water-based nanoparticles combined with a solubleimmunostimulant, Seppic).

Adjuvants may be TLR ligands, such as those discussed above. Adjuvantsthat act through TLR3 include without limitation double-stranded RNA.Adjuvants that act through TLR4 include without limitation derivativesof lipopolysaccharides such as monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA; RibiImmunoChem Research, Inc., Hamilton, Mont.) and muramyl dipeptide (MDP;Ribi) andthreonyl-muramyl dipeptide (t-MDP; Ribi); OM-174 (a glucosaminedisaccharide related to lipid A; OM Pharma SA, Meyrin, Switzerland).Adjuvants that act through TLR5 include without limitation flagellin.Adjuvants that act through TLR7 and/or TLR8 include single-stranded RNA,oligoribonucleotides (ORN), synthetic low molecular weight compoundssuch as imidazoquinolinamines (e.g., imiquimod (R-837), resiquimod(R-848)). Adjuvants acting through TLR9 include DNA of viral orbacterial origin, or synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN), such as CpGODN. Another adjuvant class is phosphorothioate containing moleculessuch as phosphorothioate nucleotide analogs and nucleic acids containingphosphorothioate backbone linkages.

The adjuvant can also be oil emulsions (e.g., Freund's adjuvant);saponin formulations; virosomes and viral-like particles; bacterial andmicrobial derivatives; immunostimulatory oligonucleotides;ADP-ribosylating toxins and detoxified derivatives; alum; BCG;mineral-containing compositions (e.g., mineral salts, such as aluminiumsalts and calcium salts, hydroxides, phosphates, sulfates, etc.);bioadhesives and/or mucoadhesives; microparticles; liposomes;polyoxyethylene ether and polyoxyethylene ester formulations;polyphosphazene; muramyl peptides; imidazoquinolone compounds; andsurface active substances (e.g. lysolecithin, pluronic polyols,polyanions, peptides, oil emulsions, keyhole limpet hemocyanin, anddinitrophenol).

Adjuvants may also include immunomodulators such as cytokines,interleukins (e.g., IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12, etc.),interferons (e.g., interferon-.gamma.), macrophage colony stimulatingfactor, and tumor necrosis factor.

C. Combination Therapies

In some embodiments, the conjugates are administered in combination withone or more additional therapeutic agents. The agents can beadministered in the same pharmaceutical composition as the conjugates orthe conjugates and the additional therapeutic agent can be administeredin separate pharmaceutical compositions.

In some embodiments, the conjugates are administered in combination witha conventional therapeutic agent used for treatment of the disease orcondition being treated. Conventional therapeutics agents are known inthe art and can be determined by one of skill in the art based on thedisease or disorder to be treated. For example, if the disease orcondition is cancer, the conjugates can be co-administered with achemotherapeutic drug; or if the disease or condition is a bacterialinfection, the conjugates can be co-administered with an antibiotic.

IV. Methods of Use

A. Methods of Delivering Immunostimulatory Agents

1. Lymph Node Targeting

The data presented below supports the discovery that conjugating a cargosuch as an oligonucleotide, or peptide, to an albumin-binding domain canincrease delivery and accumulation of the cargo to the lymph nodes.

The lymph nodes are oval-shaped organs of the immune system, distributedwidely throughout the body including the armpit and stomach and linkedby lymphatic vessels. Lymph nodes are bastions of B, T, and other immunecells. Lymph nodes act as filters or traps for foreign particles and areimportant in the proper functioning of the immune system. They arepacked tightly with the white blood cells called lymphocytes andmacrophages.

Lymph node targeting conjugates are typically transported from theinjection site to secondary organs of the lymphatic system (e.g., lymphnodes), where interact with immune cells. It is believed thatalbumin-binding of the conjugates prevents the conjugates from rapidlyflushing into the bloodstream and re-targets them to lymphatics anddraining lymph nodes, where they are filtered, accumulate, and presenttheir immunostimulatory oligonucleotide, antigenic peptide, or othercargo to immune cells.

As discussed above, albumin-binding lipids can be conjugated to, forexample, an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide or an antigenic peptidewhich increases the immunostimulatory effect of the oligonucleotide orthe antigenic peptide compared to administering non-conjugatedoligonucleotide or antigenic peptide. In some embodiments, conjugationof the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide or peptide antigen to the analbumin-binding lipid increases accumulation of the cargo 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, 8, 9, 10, or more fold compare to unconjugated cargo.

2. Tissue Specific Targeting

Micelle-stabilizing conjugates can be used to increase delivery andaccumulation of the cargo to the tissue at or near a site ofadministration. Micelle-stabilizing conjugates are believed to beresistant to disruption by serum proteins such as albumin. Therefore,they can accumulate at the site of injection, for example, by binding toextracellular matrix proteins, or inserting into the cell membranes oflocal cells.

Micelle-stabilizing conjugates can be used to increase localaccumulation of immunostimulatory oligonucleotides, antigenic peptides,small molecules, and other targets at the site of administration. Insome embodiments, conjugation of the immunostimulatory oligonucleotideor peptide antigen increases local accumulation of the cargo 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more fold compare to unconjugated cargo.

B. Methods of Increasing an Immune Response

Lipid conjugates including an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide orantigenic peptide cargo can be administered in an effective amount toinduce, increase or enhance an immune response. The “immune response”refers to responses that induce, increase, induce, or perpetuate theactivation or efficiency of innate or adaptive immunity. Further,albumin-binding lipid conjugates of polypeptide antigens administered inthe absence of other adjuvants may be used to promote tolerance ratherthan immunity, e.g., to an allergen or autoimmune antigen. Theconjugates can be delivered parenterally (by subcutaneous, intradermal,or intramuscular injection) through the lymphatics, or by systemicadministration through the circulatory system. It is noted that thelymph nodes can filter albumin-bound conjugates. Therefore, in someembodiments parenteral administration does not result in systemicdistribution as the conjugates may be preferentially filtered by theclosest lymph node(s). This tendency also reduces systemic toxicity suchas swelling of the spleen.

Accordingly, in some embodiments, the conjugates are administered at asite adjacent to or leading to one or more lymph nodes which are closeto the site in need of an immune response (i.e., close to a tumor orsite of infection). In some embodiments, the conjugates are administeredin multiple doses at various locations throughout the body. Theconjugates, particularly micelle-stabilizing conjugates can also beadministered directly to a site in need of an immune response (e.g., atumor or site of infection).

The immune response can be induced, increased, or enhanced by the lipidconjugate compared to a control, for example an immune response in asubject induced, increased, or enhanced by the cargo alone, or the cargodelivered using an alternative delivery strategy such as liposomes. Asdiscussed in more detail below, in some embodiments, lipid conjugatesreduce inactivation and/or prolong activation of T cells (i.e., increaseantigen-specific proliferation of T cells, enhance cytokine productionby T cells, stimulate differentiation ad effector functions of T cellsand/or promote T cell survival) or overcome T cell exhaustion and/oranergy.

The lipid conjugates can be used, for example, to induce an immuneresponse, when administering the cargo alone, or the cargo incombination with an alternative delivery system, is ineffectual. Thelipid conjugates can also be used to enhance or improve the immuneresponse compared to administering cargo alone. In some embodiments, thelipid conjugates may reduce the dosage required to induce, increase, orenhance an immune response; or reduce the time needed for the immunesystem to respond following administration.

Lipid conjugates may be administered as part of prophylactic vaccines orimmunogenic compositions which confer resistance in a subject tosubsequent exposure to infectious agents, or as part of therapeuticvaccines, which can be used to initiate or enhance a subject's immuneresponse to a pre-existing antigen, such as a viral antigen in a subjectinfected with a virus or with cancer.

The desired outcome of a prophylactic or therapeutic immune response mayvary according to the disease or condition to be treated, or accordingto principles well known in the art. For example, an immune responseagainst an infectious agent may completely prevent colonization andreplication of an infectious agent, affecting “sterile immunity” and theabsence of any disease symptoms. However, a vaccine against infectiousagents may be considered effective if it reduces the number, severity orduration of symptoms; if it reduces the number of individuals in apopulation with symptoms; or reduces the transmission of an infectiousagent. Similarly, immune responses against cancer, allergens orinfectious agents may completely treat a disease, may alleviatesymptoms, or may be one facet in an overall therapeutic interventionagainst a disease.

The lipid conjugates induce an improved effector cell response such as aCD4 T-cell immune response, against at least one of the componentantigen(s) or antigenic compositions compared to the effector cellresponse obtained with the corresponding composition without the lipidconjugate. The term “improved effector cell response” refers to a highereffector cell response such as a CD8 or CD4 response obtained in a humanpatient after administration of the vaccine composition than thatobtained after administration of the same composition without a lipidconjugate.

The improved effector cell response can be obtained in animmunologically unprimed patient, i.e. a patient who is seronegative tothe antigen. This seronegativity may be the result of the patient havingnever faced the antigen (so-called “naïve” patient) or, alternatively,having failed to respond to the antigen once encountered. In someembodiments, the improved effector cell response is obtained in animmunocompromised subject.

The improved effector cell response can be assessed by measuring thenumber of cells producing any of the following cytokines: (1) cellsproducing at least two different cytokines (CD40L, IL-2, IFN-gamma,TNF-alpha); (2) cells producing at least CD40L and another cytokine(IL-2, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma); (3) cells producing at least IL-2 andanother cytokine (CD40L, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma); (4) cells producing atleast IFN-gamma and another cytokine (IL-2, TNF-alpha, CD40L); (5) andcells producing at least TNF-alpha and another cytokine (IL-2, CD40L,IFN-gamma).

An improved effector cell response is present when cells producing anyof the above cytokines will be in a higher amount followingadministration of the vaccine composition compared to control asdiscussed above.

In a preferred embodiment, the composition increases the number of Tcells producing IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, or a combination thereof, orincreases the production of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, or a combinationthereof in the existing T cells.

In some embodiments, the administration of the immunogenic compositionalternatively or additionally induces an improved B-memory cell responsein patients administered lipid conjugates compared to a control. Animproved B-memory cell response is intended to mean an increasedfrequency of peripheral blood B lymphocytes capable of differentiationinto antibody-secreting plasma cells upon antigen encounter as measuredby stimulation of in vitro differentiation.

In a still another embodiment, the immunogenic composition increases theprimary immune response as well as the CD8 response. The administrationof the lipid conjugates induces an improved CD4 T-cell, or CD8 T-cellimmune response against a specific antigen compared to a control. Thismethod may allow for inducing a CD4 T cell response which is morepersistent in time. Preferably the CD4 T-cell immune response, such asthe improved CD4 T-cell immune response obtained in an unprimed subject,involves the induction of a cross-reactive CD4 T helper response. Inparticular, the amount of cross-reactive CD4 T cells is increased. Theterm “cross-reactive” CD4 response refers to CD4 T-cell targeting sharedepitopes for example between influenza strains.

C. Diseases to Be Treated

1. Cancer

The disclosed lipid conjugates are useful for stimulating or enhancingan immune response in host for treating cancer. The types of cancer thatmay be treated with the provided compositions and methods include, butare not limited to, the following: bladder, brain, breast, cervical,colo-rectal, esophageal, kidney, liver, lung, nasopharangeal,pancreatic, prostate, skin, stomach, uterine, ovarian, testicular andhematologic.

Malignant tumors which may be treated are classified herein according tothe embryonic origin of the tissue from which the tumor is derived.Carcinomas are tumors arising from endodermal or ectodermal tissues suchas skin or the epithelial lining of internal organs and glands.Sarcomas, which arise less frequently, are derived from mesodermalconnective tissues such as bone, fat, and cartilage. The leukemias andlymphomas are malignant tumors of hematopoietic cells of the bonemarrow. Leukemias proliferate as single cells, whereas lymphomas tend togrow as tumor masses. Malignant tumors may show up at numerous organs ortissues of the body to establish a cancer.

The conjugates can be administered in as an immunogenic composition oras part of vaccine, such as prophylactic vaccines, or therapeuticvaccines, which can be used to initiate or enhance a subject's immuneresponse to a pre-existing antigen, such as a tumor antigen in a subjectwith cancer.

The desired outcome of a prophylactic or therapeutic immune response mayvary according to the disease, according to principles well known in theart. Similarly, immune responses against cancer, may alleviate symptoms,or may be one facet in an overall therapeutic intervention against adisease. For example, administration of the lipid conjugates may reducetumor size, or slow tumor growth compared to a control. The stimulationof an immune response against a cancer may be coupled with surgical,chemotherapeutic, radiologic, hormonal and other immunologic approachesin order to affect treatment.

2. Infectious Diseases

In a preferred embodiment, the lipid conjugates are useful for treatingacute or chronic infectious diseases. Because viral infections arecleared primarily by T-cells, an increase in T-cell activity istherapeutically useful in situations where more rapid or thoroughclearance of an infective viral agent would be beneficial to an animalor human subject. Thus, the lipid conjugates antagonists can beadministered for the treatment of local or systemic viral infections,including, but not limited to, immunodeficiency (e.g., HIV), papilloma(e.g., HPV), herpes (e.g., HSV), encephalitis, influenza (e.g., humaninfluenza virus A), and common cold (e.g., human rhinovirus) viralinfections. For example, pharmaceutical formulations including the lipidconjugates can be administered topically to treat viral skin diseasessuch as herpes lesions or shingles, or genital warts. The lipidconjugates can also be administered to treat systemic viral diseases,including, but not limited to, AIDS, influenza, the common cold, orencephalitis.

Representative infections that can be treated, include but are notlimited to infections cause by microoganisms including, but not limitedto, Actinomyces, Anabaena, Bacillus, Bacteroides, Bdellovibrio,Bordetella, Borrelia, Campylobacter, Caulobacter, Chlamydia, Chlorobium,Chromatium, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Cytophaga, Deinococcus,Escherichia, Francisella, Halobacterium, Heliobacter, Haemophilus,Hemophilus influenza type B (HIB), Histoplasma, Hyphomicrobium,Legionella, Leishmania, Leptspirosis, Listeria, Meningococcus A, B andC, Methanobacterium, Micrococcus, Myobacterium, Mycoplasma, Myxococcus,Neisseria, Nitrobacter, Oscillatoria, Prochloron, Proteus, Pseudomonas,Phodospirillum, Rickettsia, Salmonella, Shigella, Spirillum,Spirochaeta, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Streptomyces, Sulfolobus,Thermoplasma, Thiobacillus, and Treponema, Vibrio, Yersinia,Cryptococcus neoformans, Histoplasma capsulatum, Candida albicans,Candida tropicalis, Nocardia asteroides, Rickettsia ricketsii,Rickettsia typhi, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydial psittaci, Chlamydialtrachomatis, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Trypanosomabrucei, Entamoeba histolytica, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichomonas vaginalisand Schistosoma mansoni.

In some embodiment, the type of disease to be treated or prevented is achronic infectious disease caused by a bacterium, virus, protozoan,helminth, or other microbial pathogen that enters intracellularly and isattacked, e.g., by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

In a preferred embodiment, infections to be treated are chronicinfections cause by a hepatitis virus, a human immunodeficiency virus(HIV), a human T-lymphotrophic virus (HTLV), a herpes virus, anEpstein-Barr virus, or a human papilloma virus.

EXAMPLES Example 1: Albumin-Binding Lipo-Oligo Conjugates Accumulate inthe Lymph Nodes Materials and Methods

Oligonucleotide Synthesis

Oligonucleotides were synthesized in 1.0 micromolar scale on anautomated DNA synthesiszer (ABI 394, Applied Biosystems, Inc.). All DNAsynthesis reagents including cholesteryl-TEG phosphoramadite andDMT-PEG-phosphoramadite were purchased from Glenres and Chemgenes andused by following manufacturer's instructions. Immunostimulatory CpGoligos employed were a type B sequence known as 1826. Synthesis of lipidphosphoramidite and solid phase conjugation was followed by previousreports. Particle size was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS)using a 90Plus/ZetaPals particle size and -potential analyzer(Brookhaven Instruments). DSPE-PEG₂₀₀₀-Maleimide was purchased fromLaysan Bio Inc. carboxyfluorescein labeled PEG₂₀₀₀-DSPE were purchasedfrom Avanti Polar lipids Inc. carboxyfluorescein labeled NHS-PEG₂₀₀₀ waspurchased from nanocs Inc. Peptides were purchased from Genscript Corp.(Piscataway, N.J.). Incomplete Freund s adjuvant (IFA) and fatty acidfree BSA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Synthesis of Diacyllipid Phophoramidite

The diacyllipid phosphoramidite was synthesized in two steps asdescribed by Liu, et al. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7252-7255.

A solution of stearoyl chloride (6.789 g, 22.41 mmol) in ClCH₂CH₂Cl (50ml) was added dropwise to a solution of 1,3-diamino-2-dydroxypropane(1.0 g, 11.10 mmol) in the presence of ClCH₂CH₂Cl (100 ml) andtriethylamine (2.896 g, 22.41 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirredfor 2 hours at room temperature and then heated at 70° C. overnight. Thereaction mixture was then cooled to RT, filtered, and the solid waswashed with CH₂Cl₂, CH₃OH, 5% NaHCO₃ and diethyl ether, respectively.The solid was dried under vacuum to give the intermediate product as awhite solid (yield: 90%). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 6.3 (m, 2H), 3.8(m, 1H), 3.4-3.2 (m, 4H), 2.2 (t, 4H), 1.6 (m, 4H), 1.3-1.2 (m, 60H),0.9 (t, 6H). The intermediate product (5.8 g, 9.31 mmol) and DIPEA (4.2mL, 18.62 mmol) was then dissolved in anhydrous CH₂Cl₂ (100 ml). Thesolution was cooled on an ice bath and 2-CyanoethylN,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite (8.6 mL, 0.47 mmol) was addeddropwise under dry nitrogen. After stirring at RT for 1 hour, thesolution was heated to 60° C. for 90 minutes. The reaction mixture waswashed with 5% NaHCO₃ and brine, dried over Na₂SO₄ and concentratedunder vacuum. The final product was isolated by precipitation fromacetone to afford 4 g (55% yield) phosphoramidite as a white solid. ¹HNMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 6.4 (m, 2H), 3.9 (m, 2H), 3.8 (m, 2H), 3.6 (m,2H), 3.0-2.9 (m, 2H), 2.6 (t, 2H), 2.2 (m, 4H), 1.6 (m, 6H), 1.3-1.2 (m,72H), 0.9 (t, 6H). ³¹P NMR (CDCl₃) 154 ppm.

DNA Synthesis and Lipophilic Conjugation

All DNA and RNA sequences were synthesized using an ABI 394 synthesizeron 1.0 micromole scale. All lipophilic phosphoramidites were conjugatedas a final ‘base’ on 5′ end of the oligos. Lipophilic phosphoramiditeswere dissolved in dichloromethane and coupled to oligos by using theso-called syringe synthesis technique (Storhoff, et al., J Am. Chem.Soc., 120:1959-1964 (1999)). Briefly, lipid phosphoramidites (200 μL)were mixed with activator (0.2 mM 5-Ethylthio Tetrazole in 200 μLAcetonitrile), and the mixture were pushed back and forth through theCpG column using 2 syringes for 10 min. Alternatively, lipophilicphosphoramidite could also be coupled using the DNA synthesizer (15 mincoupling time). After the synthesis, DNA was cleaved from the CpG anddeprotected and purified by reverse phase HPLC using a C4 column(BioBasic-4, 200 mm×4.6 mm, Thermo Scientific), 100 mMtriethylamine-acetic acid buffer (TEAA, pH 7.5)-acetonitrile (0-30 min,10-100%) as an eluent. Lipophilic ODNs typically eluted at 20 min whileunconjugated ODNs eluted at 8 min. Immunostimulatory CpG oligos employedwere a type B sequence known as 1826 (Ballas, et al., J. Immunol., 167,4878-4886 (2001)).

Typical sequence of Lipo-G_(n)-CpG:

(SEQ ID NO: 1) 5′diacyllipid-*G_(n)*T*C*C*A*T*G*A*C*G*T*T*C*C*T*G*A*C*G*T*T*-3′

Synthesis of Pyrene Phosphoramidite

Synthesis of Compound 1

In a 300 ml round-bottom flask, D-threoninol (0.95 g, 9.1 mmol),1-Pyrenebutyric acid (2.88 g, 10.0 mmol), DCC (2.06 g, 10.0 mmol) andNHS (1.15 g, 10 mmol) were dissolved in 50 ml DMF. The reaction mixturewas stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The insolubleN,N′-dicyclohexylurea was filtered, and DMF was removed with a rotaryvacuum evaporator to obtain an oily crude product. Compound 1 waspurified by flash chromatography (yield: 85%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃):δ 8.1-7.7 (m, 9H), 6.2 (d, 1H), 4.2-3.8 (m, 4H), 3.0 (m, 2H), 2.3-2.2(m, 4H), 1.2 (d, 3H).

Synthesis of Compound 2

Compound 1 (2.93 g, 7.2 mmol) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine (0.043 g, 0.36mmol) in 40 ml dry pyridine in a 100 ml round-bottom flask under drynitrogen. The solution was cooled on an ice bath. DMT-Cl (2.93 g, 8.64mmol) was dissolved in 10 ml dry CH2Cl2 in a 50 ml flask under nitrogenand slowly added to the above pyridine solution under dry nitrogen. Thereaction was slowly warmed up to room temperature and stirred for 24hours. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and compound 2 was isolatedby chromatography (50:50:3 ethyl acetate:hexane/triethylamine) (yield:75%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 8.3-7.5 (m, 22H), 6.1 (d, 1H), 4.2-3.9(m, 2H), 3.7 (d, 6H), 3.4-3.3 (m, 4H), 2.4-2.2 (m, 4H), 1.2 (d, 3H).

Synthesis of Compound 3

Compound 2 (1 g, 1.48 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and cooled on an icebath. Then, DIPEA (0.57 g, 4.44 mmol) and 2-CyanoethylN,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite (0.42 g, 1.78 mmol) were addedunder dry nitrogen. The reaction mixture was stirred on ice for 3 hours.The solvent was evaporated, and compound 3 was purified bychromatography (50:50:3 ethyl acetate:hexane/triethylamine) (Yield:70%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃): δ 8.3-6.6 (m, 21H), 5.82 (d, 1H), 4.4-4.2(m, 2H), 3.8 (s, 3H), 3.7 (d, 6H), 3.6-3.1 (m, 8H), 2.5 (m, 1H), 2.4-2.2(m, 5H), 1.3-0.9 (m, 20H). 31P NMR (CDCl₃) 149.

Size-Exclusion Chromatography

Size-exclusion chromatography was carried out on a Shimadzu HPLC systemequipped with a SEC-biosil column (repacked in a 200×4.6 mm column).Samples were eluted using 1×PBS+20 mM KCl at flow rate 0.5 mL perminute. In a typical experiment, 80 μL of 5 μM lipo-GnT_(10-a)CpG-Fam in1×PBS+20 mM KCl were added 20 μL FBS (Greiner Bio-one), samples werebriefly votexed and incubated at 37° C. for 2 hours then diluted in 500μL 1×PBS with 20 mM KCl, sample were then analyzed by SEC, FBS wasmonitored using absorptions at 280 nm, while ODNs were monitored at 480nm (Fam peak).

Circular Dichroism Spectometer measurements

5 μM CpG ODNs were dissolved in 1×PBS with 20 mM KCl. Circular Dichroism(CD) spectra were recorded on an Aviv Model 202 Circular DichroismSpectrometer at 20° C. Scans from 220 to 320 nm were performed with 100nm/min scanning speed, 1 nm bandwidth. For each spectrum, an average ofthree scans was taken, spectral contribution from the buffer wassubtracted.

Animals and Cells

Animals were cared for in the USDA-inspected MIT Animal Facility underfederal, state, local and NIH guidelines for animal care. C57BL/6 albinomice (6-8 weeks) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. Cells werecultured in complete medium (MEM, 5% fetal bovine serum (GreinerBio-one), 100 U/ml penicillin G sodium and 100 μm/ml streptomycin(Pen/Strep), MEM sodium pyruvate (1 mM), NaH₂CO₃, MEM vitamins, MEMnon-essential amino acids (all from Invitrogen), 20 μM β-mercaptoethanol(β-ME)).

Statistical Analysis

All error bars represent SEM. Comparisons of mean values were performedusing unpaired Student's t tests. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.Graphpad Prism 5 software was used.

Results

Albumin serves as the main fatty acid transporter in extracellularfluids. Experiments were designed to test if antigen/adjuvants modifiedwith a lipophilic albumin-binding domain would accumulate in lymphoidorgans following injection via in situ complexation and transport withendogenous albumin. To develop this strategy, model vaccines weredeveloped that include peptide antigens combined with CpG DNAs,single-stranded oligonucleotides containing unmethylatedcytosine-guanine motifs that bind Toll-like receptor-9 and serve aspotent molecular adjuvants.

To identify an optimal albumin-binding domain that could be appended toeither CpG or peptide antigens, a series of amphiphilic 20-basephosphorothioate (PS)-stabilized CpG oligos linked to various lipophilictails via the 5′ end (amph-CpGs) 3′-labeled with fluorescein amiditewere constructed (FAM, FIG. 1A) and the interaction of these amphiphileswith serum proteins by size exclusion chromatography was evaluated (SEC,FIG. 2B). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) exhibited a major fraction of proteineluting at 5.3 min in SEC (coinciding with serum albumin). Diacyllipid-conjugated CpGs (lipo-CpGs) in aq. solution eluted as micelles(3.7 min), but following incubation with 20% FBS for 2 hr, ˜46% of thisamph-CpG co-migated with albumin (FIG. 2B). In contrast, the vastmajority of mono-acyl-(C18-CpG) and cholesterol-(Cho-CpG) oligos elutedas unimers at 5.8 min essentially identical to unmodified CpG in thepresence or absence of serum, indicating stability of the PS backboneagainst serum nuclease degradation and a lack of interaction withalbumin (FIG. 2B).

Spectroscopy measurements of FRET between FAM-labeled lipo-CpG andrhodamine-conjugated albumin confirmed molecular association of thediacyl lipid amphiphile and albumin in solution (FIGS. 1F and 1G).

To determine whether CpGs with different affinity for albumin exhibitdifferential LN targeting, amph-CpGs were injected s.c. at the tail baseof mice, and 24 hr later, draining inguinal and axillary LNs wereexcised and analyzed intact by IVIS fluorescence imaging. C18-CpG andCho-CpG showed marginally increased uptake in LNs relative to unmodifiedCpG. In contrast, lipo-CpG showed a dramatic increase in LNaccumulation, 8-fold over soluble CpG at 24 hr, and much greater thanCpG delivered in two prototypical vaccine vehicles, incomplete Freund'sadjuvant or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-coated liposomes. As shown byprior studies, the PS backbone used to stabilize the CpG oligos againstserum nucleases promotes nonspecific binding to extracellular matrix atthe injection site, leading to slow clearance of the oligos from thetissue over several days. However, soluble CpG levels reached an earlylow peak in the proximal LNs and exhibited no accumulation above 0.3% ofthe injected dose at any time (FIG. 2C). In contrast, lipo-CpG wasdetected in LNs within 2 hr post injection and continued to accumulatefor 3 days before decaying, giving a total AUC of exposure to CpG in thedraining LNs greater than soluble CpG over the week following injection.LN accumulation was not dependent on TLR-9-recognized CpG motifs, asnon-CpG polythymidine amphiphiles (lipo-T₂₀) were detected in LNs atsimilarly high levels (FIG. 2J).

Example 2: Stabilized Micelles Exhibit Reduce Lymph Node TargetingMaterials and Methods

Flow Cytometry

All Antibodies were purchased from BD pharmingen or ebioscience. Cellswere acquired on a FACScanto flow cytometer (BD biosciences) andanalyzed using flowjo software (Tree Star Inc. Ashland, Oreg.).

Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICCS)

Cells were plated in 96-well round-bottomed plates and pulsed withminimum peptides in the presence of brefeldin A for 6 hours in completemedia at 37° C. Cells were stained with anti-CD8-APC and then fixedusing Cytofix (BD biosciences) according to the manufacturer'sinstructions. Cells were then washed and permeabilized. Intracellularstaining for anti-INF-γ-PE and anti-TNF-α-FITC was then performedaccording to BD's protocol. FACS data were collected and analyzed asdescribed before.

Immunohistochemistry Staining

Immunofluorescent staining was performed on 10-μm frozen sections oflymph node biopsy specimens. To reduce fading of FITC, sections weremounted in Vectashield mounting medium. (Vector Laboratories, Inc.Brulingame, Calif.) and were viewed in a Zeiss LSM 510 microscope(Oberkochen, Germany). Staining for lymph nodes sections were donedirectly with an PE-labeled CD11c and APC-labeled F4/80, or PE-labeledB220 and APC-labeled CD3 antibodies.

Results

The in vitro analyses in Example 1 indicate that lipo-CpG moleculesequilibrate between micellar and albumin-bound forms in the presence ofserum. However, enhanced lymph node accumulation achieved by theseamphiphiles could have been driven by either species. To distinguishthese possibilities, poly-guanine repeats were introduced between thediacyl lipid and CpG sequence. G-quadruplex hydrogen bonding betweenadjacent oligo strands in lipo-G_(n)-CpG micelles containing 4 or moreguanine repeats blocked access of albumin to the lipid tails andrendered the micelles stable against disassembly in the presence ofserum (discussed in more detail below).

While albumin-binding lipo-CpG and lipo-G₂-CpG exhibited robust LNtargeting, G-quartet-stabilized lipo-G₄-CpG or lipo-G₆-CpG micellesexhibited very poor LN accumulation following s.c. injection (FIG. 8A).(Note that the effect of different oligo lengths here is negligible, aslipo-T₆-CpG showed similar LN accumulation). Longitudinal analysis ofCpG fluorescence at the injection site and draining LNs showed that thelow LN accumulation of lipo-G_(4/6)-CpG amphiphiles was due to failureof the stabilized micelles to drain from the injection site. It ispossible that amplification of nonspecific matrix binding by the PS DNAbackbones in the multivalent micellar form irreversibly traps themajority of stabilized micelles at the injection site.

In agreement with the IVIS data, little detectable accumulation of CpGor lipo-G₄-CpG was seen in histological sections of draining inguinalLNs, while lipo-CpG and lipo-G₂-CpG accumulated in the subcapsular sinusand interfollicular areas reaching toward the paracortex.Immunohistochemical and flow cytometry analysis showed theseLN-accumulating amphiphiles co-localized with F4/80⁺ macrophages andCD11c⁺ dendritic cells (FIG. 3E).

Example 3: Albumin “Hitchhiking” Targets Lipo-Oligo Conjugates to theLymph Nodes Materials and Methods

Albumin-CpG Conjugate

Mouse serum albumin (10 mg in 200 uL PBS) was added 0.79 mg BMPS(Aldrich) dissolved in 20 uL DMSO. The mixture was agitated at RT for 2hours. The extra BMPS was removed by passing the mixture through a G-25column. After which the solution was added 246 ug disulfide labeledfluorescein-CpG (preactivated by 20 uL 100 mM TCEP). The mixture wasallowed to react overnight and extra CpG was dialysized (50 K MWCO) andthe absence of free CpG was confirmed by size-exclusion chlomatography.

Results

If albumin “hitchhiking” is required for optimal targeting of CpGmolecules to LNs, then covalent conjugation of oligos to albumin shouldlead to similar LN accumulation. To test this, CpG was covalentlyconjugated to mouse serum albumin (MSA) and compared LN uptake of theseconjugates vs. lipo-CpG or soluble CpG. Statistically significantdifferences were observed between the conjugates and lipo-ODNs, thefluorescence intensity of both MSA-CpG and lipo-CpG in LNs was muchgreater than that of soluble ODN. Altogether, these data indicate thatefficient LN accumulation of CpG oligonucleotides conjugated tolipophilic tails is dependent on the ability of the amphiphile topartition from micelles into a serum protein-bound state.

Example 4: Albumin-Binding Lipo-Oligo Conjugates Enhance ImmuneResponses while Minimize Systemic Toxicity In Vivo

To determine the impact of LN targeting of CpG on the immune response,mice were immunized with ovalbumin (OVA) mixed with unmodified CpG, CpGin IFA, albumin-binding CpGs (lipo-Gn-CpG, n=0, 2) orG-Quadruplex-stabilized CpG micelles (lipo-Gn-CpG, n=4, 6). Animals wereprimed on day 0, boosted on day 14, and CD8+ T-cell responses wereanalyzed on day 20. Administration of lipid-conjugated CpGs, but notunconjugated CpG (soluble CpG or CpG emulsified in IFA), resulted insignificantly increased frequencies of CD8+ T-cells that were specificfor OVA₂₅₇₋₂₆₄ compared to unmodified CpG alone or emulsified in IFA.The strongest responses were elicited by albumin-binding lipo-CpG andlipo-G₂-CpG (FIG. 4A).

Intracellular cytokine staining on peripheral blood lymphocytes showedqualitatively identical trends, with large frequencies of IFN-g- andTNF-α-producing T-cells expanded by the albumin-binding CpG amphiphiles(FIG. 4B). Control immunizations with non-TLR agonist lipo-GpC or a PEGconjugate lipo-(PEG) with 48 ethylene glycol units mixed with OVAelicited minimal responses, ruling out a direct adjuvant effect of thediacyl lipid tail.

Repeated injections of high doses albumin-binding CpGs subcutaneouslydid not induced generalized, non-specific immune activation in vivo, ascharacterized by systemic proinflammatory cytokines release (FIG. 10)and lymphocyte activation in the spleen (splenomegaly, FIG. 4D.). Incontrast, administration of free CpG in mice resulted in systemictoxicity (FIG. 10, FIG. 11). Taken together, these experiments stronglysuggest lymph node targeting amph-CpGs are potent adjuvants capable ofeliciting massive CD8 T− cell responses while avoiding systemic immuneactivation.

Example 5: Albumin “Hitchhiking” Targets Lipo-Peptide Conjugates to theLymph Nodes Materials and Methods

Synthesis of Fluorescein PEG Amphiphiles

PE lipids (1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, DMPE;1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, DMPE;1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, DPPE;1,2-dioctadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, DSPE, Avanti polarlipids. Inc.) were dissolved in 500 uL CHC13 and 500 uL DMF, 1.2 eq offluorescein-PEG₂₀₀₀-NHS (creative PEG works Inc.) was added and thereaction mixture were agitated overnight, the amphiphilic fluoresceinPEG amphiphiles were purified by reverse phase HPLC using a C4 column(BioBasic-4, 200 mm×4.6 mm, Thermo Scientific), 100 mMtriethylamine-acetic acid buffer (TEAA, pH 7.5)-methanol (0-30 min,10-100%) as an eluent.

Synthesis of Peptide Amphiphiles

N-terminal cysteine modified peptides were dissolved in DMF and mixedwith 2 equivalents Maleimide-PEG₂₀₀₀-DSPE (Laysan Bio, Inc.), themixture was agitated at RT for 24 hours. Bioconjugation was judged to beessentially complete by HPLC analysis. The peptide conjugate was thendiluted in 10×ddH₂O and lyophilized into powder, redissolved in H₂O andstored under −80° C.

Results

Synthesis of lipo-CpG is straightforward due to the solubility promotedby the long polar oligonucleotide block, but depending on the amino acidsequence, lipidated peptides can be essentially insoluble. Thus, togeneralizable the lymph node targeting approach achieved with lipo-CpGto peptide antigens and other potential vaccine components, lipo-PEGamphiphiles composed of a diacyl lipid tail linked to peptide cargos viaa polar PEG block (amph-peptides; e.g., FIG. 1C) were generated usingethylene glycol spacers of varying lengths to mimic the long polar blockof lipo-CpG.

The length of the PEG block in this design controls the balance of a3-way equilibrium in physiological conditions: amph-peptides andlipo-PEGs in pure water form micelles, but in the presence of serum andcells these amphiphiles equilibrate between binding to albumin andinsertion of their diacyl tails into cell membranes (FIG. 2F).Lipo-PEG-FAM amphiphiles with short PEG blocks showed stable plasmamembrane insertion when incubated with cells in the presence of serum invitro (FIG. 2G), which would block transit to LNs on albumin in vivo.However, increasing the polar block to 48 ethylene glycol units gavelipo-PEG amphiphiles that partitioned into solution while retainingalbumin binding (FIG. 2G). This in vitro behavior directly predicted invivo draining patterns, as lipo-PEG-FAM amphiphiles injected s.c. showedincreasing LN accumulation with increasing PEG block length (increasedfor 48 EG units compared to 4 EG units, FIG. 2H).

An analogous trend was observed for the DNA amphiphiles; lipo-Tn oligosprepared with increasing polythymidine strand length showed increasingaccumulation in LNs following s.c. injection, up to a plateauaccumulation for oligos (FIG. 2J) Like CpG amphiphiles, the structure ofthe hydrophobic block was also important; while lipo-PEG amphiphileswith long diacyl tails (≥16 carbons, which exhibit a high affinity foralbumin) showed intense fluorescence in lymph nodes, shorter lipid tailswith poor affinity for albumin showed low LN accumulation (FIG. 2I).

Example 6: Lymph Node-Targeted Vaccines Induce Immune ResponsesMaterials and Methods

Vaccine Ingredients

Minimum peptides were purchased from Anaspec; ovalbumin was purchasedfrom Worthington Biochemical Corporation; cysteine (Cys) modifiedpeptide HPV-16 E7₄₉₋₅₇ (CRAHYNIVTF), AL-11 (CAAVKNWMTQTL) and Trp-2(CSVYDFFVWL) were synthesized by GenScript and purified by reverse phaseHPLC. DSPE-PEG₂₀₀₀-Maleimide was purchased from Laysan Bio Inc. CpG ODNswere synthesized in house. IFA was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Vaccine Preparation

Mice were vaccinated by a prime-boost regimen, typically, each primingand boost vaccine in experiments consisted of the following ingredients:10 μg OVA, 1.24 nmol CpG suspended in 1×PBS with 20 mM K⁺, 10 mM Mg⁺. Inexperiments in which the IFA was used, CpG/OVA were combined with samevolume of IFA and extensively emulsified. The volume of all vaccineinjections was 100 μl. For peptide micelle, mice were primed with 10 μgof peptide-PEG₂₀₀₀-DSPE conjugate, mixed with 1.24 nmol CpGs suspendedin 1×PBS with 20 mM K⁺, 10 mM Mg⁺ and boosted with 20 μg ofpeptide-PEG₂₀₀₀-DSPE conjugate, mixed with 1.24 nmol CpGs. Mice wereinjected at the base of tail s.c.

Tetramer Staining

Tissue samples were collected and a single cell suspension (spleens andlymph nodes) was prepared. Blood were collected and red blood cells weredepleted by ACK lysing buffer. Cells were then blocked with Fc-blocker(anti-mouse CD16/CD32 monoclonal antibody) and stained with PE labeledtetramers (Beckman Coulter) and anti-CD8-APC for 30 minutes at roomtemperature. Cells were washed twice and resuspended in FACS buffer.FACS data were collected on a BD FACScanto flow cytometer and analyzedusing flowjo software. Analysis typically gated on CD8⁺, Tetramerpositive live cells.

In Vivo Cytotoxicity Assays

Splenocytes from naïve mice were pulsed with or without 10 μM SIINFEKLpeptide for 30 min, cells were then labeled with either 1 μM (for pulsedcells) or 0.1 μM (control cells) CFSE for 10 min at 37° C. andextensively washed. Cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and 10×10⁶ totalcells were injected i.v. into mice challenged previously with vaccineformulations as described above. 18 hours later, splenocytes from eachreceipt mouse were analyzed by FACS to detect the CFSE labeled cells.

Results

Based on design rules for efficient targeting of compounds to lymphnodes discussed above, peptide antigens were conjugated tocommercially-available DSPE-PEG (18-carbon diacyl lipid tail, 2KDa PEGblock) to generate amph-peptides for use in vaccination studies (FIG.9).

Having established the structure-function relationship between albuminbinding and lymph nodes retention, experiments were designed to testwhether combining antigen and CpG amphiphiles could directly impart thepriming of antigen-specific immune response. A variety of peptideantigens, including virus antigen (SIV gag, AL11), tumor associatedself-antigen (melanoma antigen, Trp2), and tumor specific antigen (humanpapillomavirus, type 16, E7, HPV-16-E7) were conjugated to maleimidefunctionalized DSPE-PEG₂₀₀₀. Antigen conjugation did not significantlyaffect the albumin binding.

Following vaccination, the elicited CD8 T-cell responses andfunctionalities were monitored using tetramer techniques orintracellular cytokine staining (ICS) as discussed above. Administrationof vaccines comprised of amph-antigens (DSPE-PEG₂₀₀₀-peptides) andamph-CpG adjuvant (lipo-G₂-CpG) resulted in dramatically increasedantigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses (FIGS. 5A-5B) for all of theabove minimal peptide epitopes. In mice vaccinated with amph-Trp2 plusamph-CpG, a mean of 15% and 7% of CD8⁺ lymphocyte produced IFN-γ andTNF-α, respectively. In contrast, two control groups receiving free Trp2exhibited only marginal CTL activities (FIG. 5B).

Directly conjugate lipid to antigen without a PEG linker resulted in adramatic decrease of immune response, indicating a long PEG linker isnecessary to elicit CD8 T-cell immune response (FIG. 5C). Thisobservation is consistent with LN accumulation data observed before,where efficient LN retention required a long PEG spacer. The above datashows that albumin-binding vaccine formulations can induce large numbersof functional antigen-specific CD8+ T-cells. Mice immunized withself-delivering formulations were consistently observed to have morepotent cytotoxic activities against peptide-pulsed target populationscompared with the unpulsed controls (FIG. 5D).

Example 7: Lymph Node-Targeted Vaccines Exhibit Therapeutic Efficacy

The therapeutic benefits of the CD8 responses generated followingimmunization were tested by treating established subcutaneous mousetumor TC-1, which expresses the E7 oncoprotein from human papillomavirustype-16 (HPV-16). 6- to 8-wk-old C57BL/6 mice were inoculated at theleft above flank with TC-1 tumor cells (3×10⁵ cells/mouse)subcutaneously. After the formation of palpable tumor (day 6), mice wererandomized and treated on day 6, day 13 and day19 with amph-HPV(DSPE-PEG-E7₄₉₋₅₇) combined with amph-CpG (Lipo-G₂-CpG) at mouse tailbase, using unconjugated E7₄₉₋₅₇ peptide and CpG as control. Tumorgrowth was followed every 2-3 days.

As showed in FIGS. 5E and 5F, tumors grew rapidly in mice not receivingvaccine. Mice treated by vaccine amphiphiles inhibited the growth ofsubcutaneously growing TC-1 tumor over several weeks (3-5 mm in diameterat the initial treatment). In contrast, treatment with unconjugated CpGoligonucleotide plus HPV-16 E7 peptide antigen had only minor antitumoreffects (FIGS. 5E and 5F), leading to a transient delay of tumor growthby day 19, after which time tumors rapidly progressed. Consideredtogether, the results demonstrate that combination of amph-peptideantigens and amph-CpG adjuvant dramatically enhances antigen-specificCTL responses and leads to improved antitumor immunity in a mouse tumormodel.

Example 8: G-Quadruplex Linkers Stabilizes Oligonucleotide MicellesMaterials and Methods

Oligonucleotide Synthesis

Oligonucleotides were synthesized in 1.0 micromolar scale on anautomated DNA synthesizer (ABI 394, Applied Biosystems, Inc.). All DNAsynthesis reagents including cholesteryl-triethylene glycol(TEG)-phosphoramadite and DMT-polyethylene glycol (PEG)-phosphoramaditewere purchased from Glenres and Chemgenes and used according tomanufacturer's instructions. Immunostimulatory cytosine-guanine (CG)oligonucleotides were a type B sequence referred to as 1826(Lipo-G_(n)-CG: 5′-diacyl lipid-G_(n)-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3′ (SEQ IDNO:1). Synthesis of lipid phosphoramidite and solid phase conjugationwas followed by previous reports. Particle size was determined bydynamic light scattering (DLS) using a 90Plus/ZetaPals particle size and-potential analyzer (Brookhaven Instruments). DSPE-PEG₂₀₀₀-Maleimide waspurchased from Laysan Bio Inc. carboxyfluorescein labeled PEG₂₀₀₀-DSPEwere purchased from Avanti Polar lipids Inc.

Circular Dichroism

Five μM of CG oligonucleotides were dissolved in 1× phosphate bufferedsaline (PBS) with 20 mM KCl. Circular Dichroism (CD) spectra wererecorded on an Aviv Model 202 Circular Dichroism Spectrometer at 20° C.Scans from 220 to 320 nm were performed with 100 nm/min scanning speed,1 nm bandwidth. For each spectrum, an average of three scans was taken,and spectral contribution from the buffer was subtracted.

Size-Exclusion Chromatography

Size-exclusion chromatography was carried out on a Shimadzu HPLC systemequipped with a SEC-biosil column (repacked in a 200×4.6 mm column).Samples were eluted using 1×PBS+20 mM KCl at flow rate 0.5 mL perminute. In a typical experiment, fluorescein-labeled DNA micelles (80 μLof 5 μM lipo-G_(n)T₁₀-nCG-Fam in 1×PBS+20 mM KCl) were incubated with20% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) (20 μL) (Greiner Bio-one), samples werebriefly vortexed and incubated at 37° C. for 2 hour, then diluted in 500μL 1×PBS+20 mM KCl. Samples were then analyzed by SEC. Fetal BovineSerum (FBS) was monitored using absorptions at 280 nm, whileoligonucleotides were monitored at 480 nm (Fam peak).

Results

Guanine (G)-rich nucleic acid sequences can fold into various types ofG-quadruplex structures (Davis, J. T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43,668-698 (2004)) (e.g., intramolecular, intermolecular, parallel, andantiparallel). To facilitate micelle self-assembly and to minimizeoligonucleotide folding, the lipid-oligonucleotide conjugate was firstsuspended in pure water, and then potassium (K⁺) containing buffer wasadded to stabilize the G-quadruplex. Formation of micelles was confirmedby transmission electronic microscopy, dynamic light scatteringmeasurements, and size-exclusion chromatography. FIG. 7B illustrates thesize profile of the self-assembled micelles, which show uniform sizedistribution.

Circular dichroism (CD) was conducted to characterize the formation ofG-quadruplex. The spectrum of Lipo-G₀T₁₀-CG oligonucleotide showed asmall negative peak near 245 nm and a positive peak near 278 nm, whilechanging the number of guanines from zero to ten induced a parallelG-quadruplex, as manifested by the shifting of positive peak from 278 nmtoward 262 nm (signature bands for parallel G-quadruplex) (Paramasivan,S., et al., Methods 43, 324-331 (2007)), while retaining the negative245 nm bands (FIG. 7C).

The design of G-quadruplex stabilized CpG adjuvants is shown in FIG. 3A.G-quadruplex stabilized CpG micelles are self-assembled from an ODNcomposed of three distinct segments: an immunostimulatory CpG-ODN, acentral repeat block contained n=1-10 G-quartet-forming guaninesfollowed by 10-n non-interacting thymidines and a diacyllipid tail (FIG.3A). Pyrene excimer fluorescence was used to assay the stabilities ofG-quadruplex micelles in the presence of albumin (FIG. 3B). Pyrene dyeincorporated in stabilized CpG micelles (n>2) retains the excimerfluorescence in the presence of high concentration of albumin. Incontrast, albumin binds to the lipids moiety of unstabilized micelles(n≤2) and disrupts the micelle structures, results in a decrease ofexcimer fluorescence in an albumin concentration dependent manner (FIG.3B). The stability of the DNA micelles in the presence of serum proteinwas also investigated by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) (FIG. 3C).Micelles have relatively high molecular mass thus they eluted at 3.7minutes, while FBS showed a major peak at 5.3 minutes. After incubation,20% of the non-stabilized micelles (lipo-G₀T₁₀-CG) were intact, whilethe remaining 80% were disrupted and bonded with FBS components (peakedat 5.2 min). In the presence of guanines, the percentage of intactmicelles increased from 36% (lipo-G₂T₈-CG) to 73% (lipo-G₄T₆-CG), andfinally reached 90% (lipo-G₆T₄-CG). Increasing the number of guanines toeight (lipo-G₈T₂-CG) and ten (lipo-G₁₀T₀-CG) did not further enhancemicelle stability. Altering the number of guanines between theCPG-oligonucleotide and lipid tail controls micelle stability in thepresence of serum proteins, as evidenced from the FBS peak.

Taken together, these experiments demonstrated that the G-quadruplexmicelle stability under micelle disrupting conditions can be controlledby altering the number of guanines.

Example 9: G-Quadruplex Linkers Influence Lymph Node Accumulation andCell Uptake Materials and Methods

Mice

C57BL/6 albino mice (6-8 weeks) were obtained from the JacksonLaboratory. Animals were cared for in the USDA-inspected MassachusettsInstitute of Technology (MIT) Animal Facility under federal, state,local and NIH guidelines for animal care.

Isolation of Bone Marrow Cells

Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells were prepared following amodification of the procedure of Inaba as previously reported. Dendriticcells were activated/matured with 500 nM CG probes for 12 hours andwashed three times with PBS before use. Cells were cultured in completemedium (MEM, 5% fetal bovine serum (Greiner Bio-one), 100 units (U)/mlpenicillin G sodium and 100m/ml streptomycin (Pen/Strep), MEM sodiumpyruvate (1 mM), NaH2CO3, MEM vitamins, MEM non-essential amino acids(all from Invitrogen), and 20 μM β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME)).

In Vivo Imaging and Flow Cytometry

The draining lymph nodes of each group of mice were analyzed by In VivoImaging Systems (IVIS®) and flow cytometry 24 and 72 hourspost-injection. All antibodies for flow cytometry were purchased from BDPharmingen or Ebioscience.

Statistical Analysis

All error bars represent SEM. Comparisons of mean values were performedusing unpaired Student's t tests. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.GraphPad Prism 5 software was used.

Results

The lymphatic system absorbs interstitial fluid from tissue and returnsit to the blood via lymph nodes. Animal experiments were conducted toassess micelle targeting to the lymphatic system. Dye-labeled CGoligonucleotides, dye-labeled CG oligonucleotides emulsified in IFA, ordye-labeled lipo-G_(n)-CG micelles (n=0, 2, 4, or 6) were injectedsubcutaneously into separate groups of mice. The draining lymph nodes ofeach group of mice were analyzed by In Vivo Imaging Systems (IVIS®) andflow cytometry 24 and 72 hours post-injection. Cells were acquired on aFACScanto flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using Flowjosoftware (Tree Star Inc. Ashland, Oreg.).

All lymph nodes were visibly enlarged, reaching maximum enlargement by24 hours. Fluorescence imaging of the isolated lymph nodes at 24 and 72hours revealed a significant difference among the different groups ofmice. The number of modestly-stabilized lipo-G_(n)-CpG micelles (n=0 or2) retained by the inguinal (proximal lymph node) and axillary (distallymph nodes) lymph nodes was greater than the number of over-stabilizedlipo-G_(n)-CpG micelles (n=4 or 6) retained, with peak lymph nodetargeting achieved by lipid-G₂-CpG micelles (FIGS. 8A and 8B). 72 hoursafter injection, uptake of destabilized lipid-G_((0 or 2))-CpG micellesby dendritic cells (DCs) increased by 5-fold, uptake by macrophagesincreased by 8-fold, and uptake by B cells increased by 5-fold, ascompared to soluble CpG oligonucleotides. By contrast, more stablelipo-G_((4 or 6))-CG micelles exhibited a low level of lymph noderetention and cell association.

Example 10: Immunostimulatory Micelles Induce Antigen-Specific CD8⁺T-Cell Expansion

Materials and Methods

Mouse CD8+ T-cell expansion was examined followingimmunization/vaccination with modestly-stabilized (lipo-G_((0 or 2))-CpGoligo) or over-stabilized (lipo-G_((4 or 6))-CpG oligo)immunostimulatory micelles, using soluble CpG oligonucleotide as acontrol. C57B16 (B6) Mice were vaccinated on days 0 and 14 and analyzedon day 20 or 21. Typically, each injection contained the followingingredients: 10 μg ovalbumin (OVA) antigen (purchased from WorthingtonBiochemical Corporation) and 1.24 nmol lipo-G_(n)-CG micelle suspendedin 1×PBS (20 mM K⁺ and 10 mM Mg⁺). Ovalbumin (OVA) was used as a modelantigen because it has a well-studied H-2 Kb-restricted MHC class Iepitope in B6 mice. In experiments in which Incomplete Freund's adjuvant(IFA) was used, a volume of soluble CpG oligonucleotides and soluble OVAantigen were combined with an equal volume of IFA and emulsified. Thetotal volume of each vaccine injection was 100 μl. Mice were injectedsubcutaneously at the base of the tail. Post-immunization, blood sampleswere collected from spleens and lymph nodes, and single-cell suspensionswere prepared (red blood cells were depleted by ACK lysing buffer). Theblood sample preparations were evaluated by MHC class I-restrictedOVA₂₅₇₋₂₆₄ tetramer staining to track SIINFEKL-specific CD8⁺ T-cellexpansion. Cysteine (cys) modified peptide OVA₂₅₇₋₂₆₄ (CSIINFEKL) wassynthesized by GenScript and purified by reverse phase HPLC. Cells werethen blocked with Fc-blocker (anti-mouse CD16/CD32 monoclonal antibody)and stained with PE labeled Kb/SIINFEKL tetramer (Beckman Coulter) andanti-CD8-APC for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed twiceand resuspended in FACS buffer. FACS data were collected on a BDFACScanto flow cytometer and analyzed using Flowjo software. Analysistypically gated on CD8⁺, Tetramer positive live cells.

Results

Administration of the immunostimulatory micelles resulted in expansionof CD8+ T-cells specific for OVA₂₅₇₋₂₆₄ (FIGS. 4A and 4B). Unexpectedly,the modestly-stabilized lipo-G₂-CpG oligo-based micelles were the mosteffective in stimulating SIINFEKL-specific CD8⁺ T-cell expansion. Sixdays after the second (boost) injection of the destabilized lipo-G₂-CpGoligo-based micelles, approximately 33% of all CD8+ T-cells detected inthe blood were specific for the antigen, while only approximately 7% ofall CD8+ T-cells were antigen specific following administration of theboost with stabilized lipo-G₆-CpG oligo-based micelles. Thus, thestrength of the T-cell response stimulated by this vaccine was directlycorrelated with modestly-stabilized CpG micelles that exhibited maximalaccumulation in lymph nodes.

To examine the responsiveness of the CD8⁺ T cells, blood lymphocyteswere re-stimulated ex vivo for 6 hours with the OVA-specific peptide,SIINFEKL, and analyzed for the production of cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α.Cells were plated in 96-well round-bottomed plates and pulsed withminimum peptides in the presence of brefeldin A for 6 hours in completemedia at 37° C. Cells were stained with anti-CD8-APC and then fixedusing Cytofix (BD biosciences) according to the manufacturer'sinstructions. Cells were then washed and permeabilized. Intracellularstaining for anti-INF-γ-PE and anti-TNF-α-FITC was then performedaccording to BD's protocol. FACS data were collected and analyzed asdescribed. Again, the destabilized lipo-G₂-CpG oligo-based micelles werethe most effective (FIG. 4B), correlating with the above findings.

Additional in vivo cytotoxic lymphocyte (CTL) assays were conducted toassess whether the expanded CD8+ T cell populations were functional.Splenocytes from naïve mice were pulsed with or without 10 μM SIINFEKLpeptide for 30 min. Cells were then labeled with either 1 μM (for pulsedcells) or 0.1 μM (control cells) CFSE for 10 min at 37° C. andextensively washed. Cells were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and 10×10⁶totalcells were injected intravenously (i.v.) into mice challenged previouslywith vaccine formulations as described above. Post 18 hours, splenocytesfrom each recipient mouse were analyzed by FACS to detect the CFSElabeled cells. CD8⁺ T cells from mice immunized with immunostimulatorylipo-G_(n)-CG-based micelles lysed >97.9% of the peptide-pulsed targetpopulation, whereas CD8⁺ T cells from mice immunized with soluble CpGoligonucleotide lysed an average 54.6% of target cells.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meanings as commonly understood by one of skill in the artto which the disclosed invention belongs. Publications cited herein andthe materials for which they are cited are specifically incorporated byreference.

Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain usingno more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specificembodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents areintended to be encompassed by the following claims.

We claim:
 1. An amphiphilic albumin-binding conjugate comprising (a) alipid component; (b) an optional polar component; and (c) animmunomodulatory compound or molecular adjuvant; wherein theimmunomodulatory compound or molecular adjuvant is bound directly to thelipid or is bound to the lipid via a linker, wherein the conjugate issufficiently soluble such that the lipid binds to albumin underphysiological conditions, and wherein a plurality of the conjugates canspontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution.
 2. The conjugate ofclaim 1 wherein the immunomodulatory compound or molecular adjuvant isbound to the lipid via a linker.
 3. The conjugate of claim 2 wherein thelinker is an oligonucleotide linker.
 4. The conjugate of claim 3 whereinthe oligonucleotide linkers comprises “N” consecutive guanines, whereinN is between 0-2.
 5. The conjugate of claim 4 comprising the structureL-5′-Gn-ON-3′, wherein “L” the lipid, “G” is a guanine, “n” is 0-2, and“ON” is the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide.
 6. The conjugate of claim1 wherein the oligonucleotide-conjugate exhibits increased accumulationin the lymph node when administered to a subject in vivo compared toadministration of the immunostimulatory oligonucleotide alone.
 7. Theconjugate of claim 1 wherein the lipid is a diacyl lipid.
 8. Theconjugate of claim 1 wherein the acyl chains of the lipid comprise 12-30hydrocarbon units.
 9. The conjugate of claim 1 wherein theimmunostimulatory oligonucleotide can bind a pattern recognitionreceptor.
 10. The conjugate of claim 9 wherein the immunostimulatoryoligonucleotide comprises CpG.
 11. The conjugate of claim 10 wherein theimmunostimulatory oligonucleotide is a ligand for a Toll-like receptor.12. The conjugate of claim 1 wherein the immunostimulatoryoligonucleotide has a phosphorothioate (PS) backbone.
 13. The conjugateof claim 1 wherein the oligonucleotide comprises 20 or more nucleicacids.
 14. A vaccine adjuvant comprising a plurality of theoligonucleotide-conjugates of claim
 1. 15. An oligonucleotide conjugatecomprising an immunostimulatory oligonucleotide which is linked to alinker comprising at least 3 consecutive guanines which is conjugated toa lipid, wherein a plurality of the oligonucleotide conjugates canspontaneously form micelles in aqueous solution, and wherein more than36% of the micelles are intact in the presence of 20% fetal bovineserum.
 16. The oligonucleotide conjugate of claim 15 wherein theoligonucleotide conjugate comprises the structure L-5′-Gn-ON-3′, wherein“L” the lipid, “G” is a guanine, “n” is 3-10, and “ON” is theimmunostimulatory oligonucleotide.
 17. A vaccine adjuvant comprising aplurality of the oligonucleotide-conjugates of claim
 15. 18. Anamphiphilic peptide conjugate comprising a peptide antigen which (i) isconjugated directly to a lipid, or (ii) is linked to a linker which isconjugated to a lipid, wherein the lipid binds to albumin underphysiological conditions, wherein the peptide antigen, the linker, orthe peptide antigen and linker in combination are sufficiently polar toreduced or inhibit insertion of the lipid into a cell's plasma membrane.19. The peptide conjugate of claim 18 wherein the peptide antigen islinked to a linker which is conjugated to the lipid.
 20. The peptideconjugate of claim 19 wherein the linker is selected from the groupconsisting of hydrophilic polymers, a string of hydrophilic amino acids,polysaccharides or a combination thereof.
 21. The peptide conjugate ofclaim 19 wherein the linker comprises “N” consecutive polyethyleneglycol units, wherein N is between 25-50.
 22. The peptide conjugate ofclaim 18 wherein the peptide conjugate exhibits increased accumulationin the lymph node when administered to a subject in vivo compared toadministration of the antigenic peptide alone.
 23. The peptide conjugateof claim 18 wherein the lipid is a diacyl lipid.
 24. The peptideconjugate of claim 18 wherein the acyl chains of the lipid comprise12-30 hydrocarbon units.
 25. An immunogenic composition comprising theadjuvant of claim 14 and an antigen.
 26. The immunogenic composition ofclaim 25 wherein the antigen is an amphiphilic peptide conjugatecomprising a peptide antigen which (i) is conjugated directly to alipid, or (ii) is linked to a linker which is conjugated to a lipid,wherein the lipid binds to albumin under physiological conditions, andwherein the peptide antigen, the linker, or the peptide antigen andlinker in combination are sufficiently polar to reduced or inhibitinsertion of the lipid into a cell's plasma membrane.
 27. An immunogeniccomposition comprising the adjuvant of claim 17 and an antigen.
 28. Amethod of increasing an immune response in a subject comprisingadministering the subject an effective amount of immunogenic compositionof claim 25 to increase the immune response in the subject.
 29. Themethod of claim 28 wherein the immune response is an increase in thenumber of CD8+ T cell expressing TNF- or INF-compared to a control. 30.The method of claim 18 wherein the subject has cancer or an infectiousdisease.
 31. A method of treating cancer or an infectious diseasecomprising administering to the subject an effective amount of theimmunogenic composition of claim 25 to reduce one or more symptoms ofthe cancer or infectious disease compared to a control.